Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yeo Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$190kYouth Development$77kFood & Nutrition$44kHuman Services$35kCommunity Improvement$33kHealth$29kArts & Culture$26kReligion$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$151k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIDDEN HARVEST$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$5,000
READ ASSOCIATION OF SAGINAW COUNTY$5,000
RESCUE MINISTRIES OF MID-MICHIGAN$5,000
EAST SIDE SOUP KITCHEN$5,000
GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN$5,000
CAN COUNCIL$5,000
GENERATION E INSTITUTE$5,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GLBR$5,000
YMCA OF SAGINAW$5,000
SAGINAW CHORAL SOCIETY$4,500
SAGINAW CHILDREN'S ZOO$3,500
SCOUTING AMERICA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HIDDEN HARVEST: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$288k · 24 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -22% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
10

Total granted

$288k
$174k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-22%

Still filing today

54%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    East Side Soup Kitchen
    7× · 2018–2025 · $21k · revenue +27%
  • GE
    Generation E Institute
    6× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue ×13 · 55% of their budget
  • CH
    COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • SV
    SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $165k
  • OT
    OLD TOWN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • CF
    CHILD FAMILY SERVICES OF SAGINAW
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saginaw Public Libraries Foundation

Support library activities through materials and services

—
2
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
3
Great Lakes Bay Health Centers

To provide high quality health care to individuals and community groups in Saginaw, Bay, and other nearby counties. Services are provided without regard to race, beliefs or ability to pay.

Health
4
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
5
Historical Society of Saginaw County

The historical society of saginaw county is committed to serve the community by telling the continuing story of the people of the saginaw region through exploration, preservation and presentation of their historical and cultural heritage.

—
6
Montessori Childrens House of Lenawee Inc

Education of young people in the Montessori method

Human Services
7
Housing Services of Mid Michigan

To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
8
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
9
Midland County Cancer Society Dba Cancer Services

To provide personal and compassionate support to cancer patients and their caregivers in our community.

—
10
Historical Society of Michigan

The Historical Society of Michigan will foster in citizens a deeper understanding of and appreciation for all Michigan history through programs and publications; preserve and promote Michigan history through conferences, publications,…

Arts & Culture
11
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
12
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saginaw Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Generation E Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $164,987 · OtherSAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYEast Side Soup Kitchen: $21,250 · OtherEast Side Soup KitchenBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF THE GLBR: $15,750 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE GLB: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherYMCA: $13,000 · OtherCAN COUNCIL - GLBR: $12,500 · Other+18 more: $70,400 · Other+18 moreREAD Association of Saginaw County: $23,385 · EducationREAD Assoc…Generation E Institute: $20,000 · EducationGeneration…Hoyt Trust: $1,500 · EducationCOVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $17,050 · HealthFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE: $8,500 · HealthHOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF SAGINAW: $3,500 · HealthSAGINAW CHORAL SOCIETY INC: $11,000 · Arts & CultureMAJOR CHORDS FOR MINORS: $9,000 · Arts & CultureMID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $4,000 · Arts & CultureGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $22,600 · Youth DevelopmentHIDDEN HARVEST: $15,000 · Human ServicesRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $8,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$325,887Education$44,885Health$29,050Arts & Culture$24,000Youth Development$22,600Human Services$15,000Housing & Shelter$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREAD Association of Saginaw County: $23,385 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $22,600 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEast Side Soup Kitchen: $21,250 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetGeneration E Institute: $20,000 over 6y, 55% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $17,050 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHIDDEN HARVEST: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAGINAW CHORAL SOCIETY INC: $11,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMAJOR CHORDS FOR MINORS: $9,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $8,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE: $8,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAGINAW VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF SAGINAW: $3,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSaginaw Community Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHoyt Trust: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetReece Endeavor of Midland: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds READ Association of Saginaw County ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds East Side Soup Kitchen ↗
  • Who funds Generation E Institute ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds SAGINAW CHORAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION ↗
  • Who funds MAJOR CHORDS FOR MINORS ↗
  • Who funds Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan ↗
  • Who funds FIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SAGINAW VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF SAGINAW ↗
  • Who funds Saginaw Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Hoyt Trust ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Reece Endeavor of Midland ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saginaw Community FoundationMI36.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saginaw Community Foundation · Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation · Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation · Wallace & Irene Bronner Family Charitable Foundation · Morley Foundation · Alice E Turner Memorial Trust · Frank N Andersen Foundation · Wm McNally Family Foundation · Bierlein Companies Foundation · Boutell Memorial Fund · Harvey Randall Wickes Foundation · Harvey Memorial Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yeo Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yeo Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yeo Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph