Skip to content

· Public charity

Yellowhammer Fund

Yellowhammer Fund is a reproductive justice orgqanization dedicated to ensuring all people have the ability to decide when and how to build their families, regardless of race, income, location, age, gender, sexuality, disability, documentation status or number of children.

$816k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$147k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$416kCommunity Improvement$361kHealth$268kCivil Rights$149kArts & Culture$57kHousing & Shelter$21kPhilanthropy$20kCrime & Legal$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $560,826, the rows itemized in this filing. The $816,471 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $255,645 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $294k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $247k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Margins$146,860
Alabama Cohosh Collaborative$100,000
TAKE Resource Center$33,500
North Carolina Survivors Union$25,000
West Alabama Womens Clinic$21,786
Be Kind Birmingham$20,500
Oasis Womens Health$20,000
The Cohill Foundation$20,000
The morning Sickness Clinic$20,000
Ebony Alliance$20,000
Chocolate Milk Mommies$20,000
Reclaiming Our Time$18,000
Black Belt Community Foundation$15,000
United Women of Color$15,000
The Black Inmate Commissary Fund$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Be Kind Birmingham: $21k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$264k · 3 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$264k
$501k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $546k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2020 · $125k
  • MH
    MARGINSWOMEN HELPING BLACK WOMEN
    3× · 2019–2021 · $83k
  • TK
    THE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $57k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $326k
  • MR
    MISSISSIPPI REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $73k
  • KA
    KNOXVILLE ABORTION DOULA COLLECTIVE
    one grant, 2019 · $31k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective

Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective is a free and charitable clinic and social safety net. Ubuntu Black Family Wellness Collective serves Black pregnant and parenting mamas, their babies and children through community-based, holistic…

Health
2
Black Coalition for Safe Motherhood

Community health care advocacy education

Civil Rights
3
Black Doula Project Inc

To provide free doula services to women of color and to provide doula trainings to other Black women to help build their own business.

Health
4
Delivering Unto You

We offer a safe empowering pregnancy and birth environment by providing midwifery care education and support for Black families and other families of color in Travis County and surrounding areas Our organization was created to help black…

Health
5
Maternal Coalition

The Maternal Coalition (TMC) mission is to ensure all pregnant and parenting people have access to just and equitable healthcare

Health
6
Birthright of Charleston

Pregnancy center providing counseling, testing, and baby supplies

—
7
Southern Birth Justice Network

To provide midwife services and make the care accessible to all peoples - especially black, born, youth, immigrant, indigenous, lgbtq+, low income and other marginalized communities.

Human Services
8
Black Birth Justice Inc

Advocating for maternal health rights and providing superior support for postpartum persons. Our vision is to combat the Maternal and Infant mortality rate . Our focus is to protect the birthing people of the Black community with…

Health
9
Black Health Care Coalition

The organization exists to provide health and wellness services to those who are underserved by the medical system The organization provides health screenings and health promotion activities within the community at no cost to participants

Health
10
Alpha Womens Center

Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.

Human Services
11
Birthright Humble

Pregnancy Support Services

—
12
Birthright Inc

Support Women and children in need.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Women of Color; the most unlike its peers is Nc Survivors Union Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $326,431 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMARGINS WHBW: $146,860 · OtherMARGINS WHBWIndividual grant recipient: $124,694 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMARGINSWOMEN HELPING BLACK WOMEN: $82,893 · OtherMARGINSWOMEN HELPING BLACK WOMENMISSISSIPPI REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FUND: $72,850 · OtherMISSISSIPPI REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FUNDTHE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY: $56,640 · Other+19 more: $288,320 · Other+19 moreALABAMA COHOSH COLLABORATIVE: $100,000 · HealthALABAMA COHO…NC Survivors Union Inc: $25,000 · HealthNC Survivors…West Alabama Womens Center Inc: $21,786 · HealthWest Alabama…Be Kind Birmingham Inc: $20,500 · Human ServicesUNITED WOMEN OF COLOR: $15,000 · Human ServicesCHOCOLATE MILK MOMMIES INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BLACK BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropySOUTH TEXANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $10,180 · Civil Rights
Other$1,098,688Health$146,786Human Services$35,500Youth Development$20,000Philanthropy$15,000Civil Rights$10,180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALABAMA COHOSH COLLABORATIVE: $100,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetNC Survivors Union Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWest Alabama Womens Center Inc: $21,786 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCHOCOLATE MILK MOMMIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetTHE BLACK BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WOMEN OF COLOR: $15,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetSOUTH TEXANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $10,180 over 1y, 9.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALABAMA COHOSH COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds NC Survivors Union Inc ↗
  • Who funds West Alabama Womens Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Be Kind Birmingham Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHOCOLATE MILK MOMMIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BLACK BELT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WOMEN OF COLOR ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXANS FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yellowhammer Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yellowhammer Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Yellowhammer Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Yellowhammer Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yellowhammer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph