Skip to content
Y&M Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Y&M Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$7kCommunity Improvement$1kPublic Benefit$626Arts & Culture$600Health$136Philanthropy$111Public Safety & Disaster$100Human Services$5
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$72
Median grant
2
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION AVNEI TZEDEK KJ$3,580
CONGREGATION LEV CHANOCH$760
Individual grant recipient$720
VYAZREIM INC$626
UTA OF KJ FUNDRAISING$500
Individual grant recipient$500
YESHIVA DIVREI CHAIM$500
OHR TORAS CHESED$413
CONG SHAARE BETH YOSE$360
CONG TEHILLIM AVNEI ZEDEK$304
TOIREM$297
KEREN HATZOLE INC$143
MATBIA CHARITIES$111
KIRYAS JOEL VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY MED$100
CONGREGATION LEV ELIMALICH$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $36) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%REFUAH HELPLINE REFERRALS INC: $36 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION AVNEI TZEDEK KJ: $3,580 · OtherCONGREGATION AVNEI TZEDEK KJCONGREGATION LEV CHANOCH: $760 · OtherCONGREGATION LEV CHANOCHIndividual grant recipient: $720 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherYESHIVA DIVREI CHAIM: $500 · OtherUTA OF KJ FUNDRAISING: $500 · OtherOHR TORAS CHESED: $413 · OtherCONG SHAARE BETH YOSEF: $360 · Other+29 more: $2,064 · Other+29 moreVYAZREIM INC: $626 · Public BenefitMATBIA CHARITIES INC: $111 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 · PhilanthropyREFUAH HELPLINE REFERRALS INC: $36 · Human ServicesBikvei Hatzon Inc: $10 · ReligionBAIS HATZEDAKA CORP: $5 · Religion
Other$9,397Public Benefit$626Philanthropy$211Human Services$36Religion$15

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVYAZREIM INC: $626 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATBIA CHARITIES INC: $111 over 1y, 17% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE REFERRALS INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBikvei Hatzon Inc: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VYAZREIM INC ↗
  • Who funds MATBIA CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUAH HELPLINE REFERRALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Bikvei Hatzon Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundThe Schwartz Charitab…The Lexicon Foundatio…D & E Steinmetz Found…Jack Adjmi Family Fou…S&E FoundationTilly FoundationBochner FoundationMk Charity Foundation…Igcf IncKeren Avrum Yosef IncBna Charity Foundatio…
The Ojc FundNY42.3× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · D & E Steinmetz Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · S&E Foundation · Tilly Foundation · Bochner Foundation · Mk Charity Foundation Inc · Igcf Inc · Keren Avrum Yosef Inc · Bna Charity Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Y&M Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Y&M Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Y&M’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home