Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Y&M Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Religion$7kCommunity Improvement$1kPublic Benefit$626Arts & Culture$600Health$136Philanthropy$111Public Safety & Disaster$100Human Services$5
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$72
Median grant
2
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION AVNEI TZEDEK KJ$3,580
CONGREGATION LEV CHANOCH$760
Individual grant recipient$720
VYAZREIM INC$626
UTA OF KJ FUNDRAISING$500
Individual grant recipient$500
YESHIVA DIVREI CHAIM$500
OHR TORAS CHESED$413
CONG SHAARE BETH YOSE$360
CONG TEHILLIM AVNEI ZEDEK$304
TOIREM$297
KEREN HATZOLE INC$143
MATBIA CHARITIES$111
CONGREGATION LEV ELIMALICH$100
KIRYAS JOEL VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY MED$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $36) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%REFUAH HELPLINE REFERRALS INC: $36 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

Your grantees are a median of 6 years old; the field is 13. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%40%<5yr16%28%5–10yr21%8%10–20yr22%16%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr6%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%52%<5yr16%35%5–10yr21%2%10–20yr22%6%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr6%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 40% of your grantees by number, and just 52% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
11%
2,006/18,120

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONGREGATION AVNEI TZEDEK KJ — $3,580 · OtherCONGREGATION AVNEI TZEDEK KJCONGREGATION LEV CHANOCH — $760 · OtherCONGREGATION LEV CHANOCHIndividual grant recipient — $720 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $500 · OtherYESHIVA DIVREI CHAIM — $500 · OtherUTA OF KJ FUNDRAISING — $500 · OtherOHR TORAS CHESED — $413 · OtherCONG SHAARE BETH YOSEF — $360 · Other+29 more — $2,064 · Other+29 moreVYAZREIM INC — $626 · Public BenefitMATBIA CHARITIES INC — $111 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC — $100 · PhilanthropyREFUAH HELPLINE REFERRALS INC — $36 · Human ServicesBikvei Hatzon Inc — $10 · ReligionBAIS HATZEDAKA CORP — $5 · Religion
Other$9,397Public Benefit$626Philanthropy$211Human Services$36Religion$15

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVYAZREIM INC — $626 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATBIA CHARITIES INC — $111 over 1y, 17% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE REFERRALS INC — $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBikvei Hatzon Inc — $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VYAZREIM INC
  • Who funds MATBIA CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds REFUAH HELPLINE REFERRALS INC
  • Who funds Bikvei Hatzon Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY42.3× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · D & E Steinmetz Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · S&E Foundation · Tilly Foundation · Bochner Foundation · Mk Charity Foundation Inc · Igcf Inc · Keren Avrum Yosef Inc · Bna Charity Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Y&M Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
2021222324
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph