Skip to content
Xavier University of Louisiana at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Xavier University of Louisiana

The ultimate mission of the university is to contribute to the promotion of a more just and humane society by preparing its students to assume roles of leadership and service in a global society.

$14M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$6.2MHealth$2.5MScience & Tech$1.3MPhilanthropy$122kFood & Nutrition$28kRecreation & Sports$25k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $289,134, the rows itemized in this filing. The $14,476,243 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,187,109 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $242k
$24,321
Median grant
3
States reached
$562M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OSHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION$140,000
TULANE UNIVERSITY$101,693
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM$24,321
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS$10,337
NUNEZ COMMUNITY COLLEGE$7,393
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY$5,390
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL: $140k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $27k → 11%OAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $67k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM: $24k → 16%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 20%BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL: $36k → 21%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $103k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $25k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $31k → 14%SLIDELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $58k → 11%OSHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $280k → 15%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%NUNEZ COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $7k → 22%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $117k → 23%JOHNS HOPKINS: $63k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $21k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM: $24k → 16%KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 20%BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL: $36k → 21%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $97k → 13%UNIVERSITY OFNOTRE DAME: $15k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $22k → 14%SLIDELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $54k → 11%OSHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $245k → 15%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $102k → 23%JOHNS HOPKINS: $12k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $20k → 11%BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL: $36k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%SLIDELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $18k → 11%OSHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $215k → 15%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $79k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $10k → 11%OSHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $140k → 15%BROTHERES EMPOWERED TO TEACH: $40k → 23%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $67k → 23%NEW ORLEANS FOOD POLICY ADVISORY: $28k → 23%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 23%NEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS: $349k → 23%UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $60k → 23%UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $45k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
MO
MD
KS
LA
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 22 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
5

Total granted

$10M
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+29%

Still filing today

64%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Teach for America Inc
    3× · 2018–2021 · $2.2M · revenue +1%
  • RELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $1.6M · revenue +1%
  • OC
    OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • OU
    OAKLAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $67k
  • TR
    The Research Foundation for The State University of New Yorkgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $28k · revenue +29%
  • NO
    NEW ORLEANS FOOD POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2024 · $28k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
3
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
7
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
8
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
9
Northeastern University
Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Schools for New Orleans Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brothers Empowered to Teach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Teach for America Inc: $2,180,417 · EducationTeach for America IncRELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION: $1,568,142 · EducationRELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATIONNEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS INC: $1,063,259 · EducationNEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS INCTNTP INC: $604,715 · EducationTNTP INCLOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $505,680 · EducationLOYOLA UNIVERSITYTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $385,520 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND+6 more: $292,864 · EducationOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $1,219,258 · HealthOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATI…GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $752,425 · HealthGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH C…UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $105,000 · HealthWEST JEFFERSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $73,333 · HealthALTON OSCHNER MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $350,000 · OtherALTON OSCHNER M…BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL: $252,000 · OtherBARNES JEWISH H…SLIDELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $249,454 · OtherSLIDELL MEMORIA…AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $230,543 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSI…KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $90,705 · OtherKANSAS STATE UN…OAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $66,844 · OtherLSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER - NEW ORLEANS: $54,071 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $48,544 · Other+3 more: $27,782 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $122,471 · PhilanthropyNunez Community College Foundation: $7,393 · PhilanthropyNEW ORLEANS FOOD POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE: $27,760 · Food & Nutrition
Education$6,600,597Health$2,150,016Other$1,369,943Philanthropy$129,864Food & Nutrition$27,760

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTeach for America Inc: $2,180,417 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION: $1,568,142 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $1,219,258 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS INC: $1,063,259 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $752,425 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTNTP INC: $604,715 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $505,680 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $385,520 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $122,471 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION: $105,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROTHERS EMPOWERED TO TEACH: $80,124 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $75,533 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST JEFFERSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $73,333 over 3y, 25% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $62,965 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $40,036 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $28,072 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS FOOD POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE: $27,760 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetNunez Community College Foundation: $7,393 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDILLARD UNIVERSITY: $6,134 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds RELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW SCHOOLS FOR NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TNTP INC ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BROTHERS EMPOWERED TO TEACH ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WEST JEFFERSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds NEW ORLEANS FOOD POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds Nunez Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DILLARD UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Cancer Socie…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Cancer Society IncGA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Xavier University of Louisiana funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Xavier University of Louisiana. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Xavier University of Louisiana’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home