Skip to content
Wyoming Hospital Research & Education Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Wyoming Hospital Research & Education Foundation Inc

Bringing better health care to the people of wyoming.

$319k
Granted FY2019
20
Grants FY2019
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Health$472kPublic Benefit$88kPublic Safety & Disaster$66kFood & Nutrition$27kAnimals$13kEducation$9kOther$0
02FY2019 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k5 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $280k
$12,698
Median grant
7
States reached
$78k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMPBELL COUNTY HEALTH$40,220
Individual grant recipient$28,414
CODY REGIONAL HEALTH$27,596
NEWCASTLE AMBULANCE SERVICE$27,549
POWELL VALLEY HEALTHCARE$26,116
CITY OF RAWLINS ATTN DAVE GIER$17,795
GRAINGER DEPT XXX-XX-XXXX$15,766
NORTH BIG HORN HOSPITAL$13,719
Individual grant recipient$12,952
CARBON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH ATTN AMANDA BROWN$12,698
WASHAKIE COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE$12,131
Individual grant recipient$11,855
CROOK COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT$11,747
COUNTERTRADE PRODUCTS INC$11,066
SOUTH CENTRAL WYOMING EMS$10,112
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ISIMULATE ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER: $9k → 14%NORTH AMERICA RESCUE: $28k → 10%COUNTERTRADE PRODUCTS INC: $11k → 7%NORTHERN COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER: $13k → 9%FIRST LINE TECHNOLOGY: $13k → 6%SUBLETTE COUNTY RURAL HEALTH CARE DISTRICT: $5k → 8%CROOK COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT: $12k → 9%DAYTON RESCUE: $13k → 10%CODY REGIONAL HEALTH: $28k → 11%WYOMING MEDICAL CENTER: $53k → 11%WASHAKIE COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE: $12k → 11%NEWCASTLE AMBULANCE SERVICE: $28k → 12%CITY OF RAWLINS ATTN DAVE GIER: $18k → 12%HOT SPRINGS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $8k → 13%SOUTH BIG HORN HOSPITAL: $13k → 14%FREMONT COUNSELING SERVICE: $7k → 17%NORTHERN COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER: $7k → 9%CROOK COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES DISTRICT: $6k → 9%SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $7k → 10%CODY REGIONAL HEALTH: $28k → 11%COUNTY OF NATRONA WYOMING: $40k → 11%WESTON COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES: $7k → 12%CARBON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH ATTN AMANDA BROWN: $13k → 12%HOT SPRINGS COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $7k → 13%BIG HORN COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: $6k → 14%FREMONT COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH: $7k → 17%WEST PARK HOSPITAL DISTRICT: $7k → 11%COUNTY OF NATRONA WYOMING: $31k → 11%RAWLINS FIRE DEPARTMENT: $12k → 12%SOUTH BIG HORN HOSPITAL: $5k → 14%POWELL VALLEY HEALTHCARE: $26k → 11%WYOMING MEDICAL CENTER: $24k → 11%CARBON COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 12%NORTH BIG HORN HOSPITAL: $28k → 14%SOUTH CENTRAL WYOMING EMS: $10k → 12%NORTH BIG HORN HOSPITAL: $14k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$454k · 9 repeat orgs$274k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2019, 5 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$454k
$48k

Still filing today

22%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $226k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CAMPBELL COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
    3× · 2017–2019 · $132k
  • WM
    WYOMING MEDICAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $77k · revenue +12%
  • CO
    COUNTY OF NATRONA WYOMING
    2× · 2017–2018 · $71k

Funded once

  • DR
    DAYTON RESCUE
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • CC
    CARBON COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • WC
    WESTON COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMPBELL COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT: $132,259 · OtherCAMPBELL COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTCOUNTY OF NATRONA WYOMING: $70,585 · OtherCOUNTY OF NATRONA WYOMINGCODY REGIONAL HEALTH: $61,742 · OtherCODY REGIONAL HEALTHNORTH BIG HORN HOSPITAL: $41,541 · OtherNORTH BIG HORN HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $28,414 · OtherNEWCASTLE AMBULANCE SERVICE: $27,549 · Other+21 more: $241,133 · Other+21 moreWYOMING MEDICAL CENTER INC: $76,913 · HealthWYOMING MEDICAL CEN…POWELL VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC: $26,116 · HealthPOWELL VALLEY HEALT…Hot Springs County Hospital District: $14,700 · HealthHot Springs County …FREMONT COUNSELING SERVICE INC: $7,177 · HealthFREMONT COUNSELING …
Other$603,223Health$124,906

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWYOMING MEDICAL CENTER INC: $76,913 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOWELL VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC: $26,116 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHot Springs County Hospital District: $14,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREMONT COUNSELING SERVICE INC: $7,177 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WYOMING MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds POWELL VALLEY HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Hot Springs County Hospital District ↗
  • Who funds FREMONT COUNSELING SERVICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Developmental Prescho…The Leona M and Harry…
Developmental Preschool and Day CareWY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Developmental Preschool and Day Care · The Leona M and Harry B Helmsley Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wyoming Hospital Research & Education Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wyoming Hospital Research & Education Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wyoming Hospital Research & Education Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Wyoming Hospital Research & Education Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wyoming Hospital Research & Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home