Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wuethrich Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$195kHuman Services$104kHealth$73kReligion$60kAnimals$10kPhilanthropy$5kRecreation & Sports$1kArts & Culture$750Other$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UW RIVER FALLS FOUNDATION$30,000
UW MADISON FOUNDATION$24,000
Individual grant recipient$12,500
OUR SAVIORS LUTHERAN CHURCH$6,000
GREENWOOD HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
EMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
NAZARETH LUTHERAN CHURCH - WITHEE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ROCK CREEK DISABLED OUTDOORS INC: $1k → 13%PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$368k · 13 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +132% since the first grant, against +86% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$368k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+132%
+86%

Still filing today

31%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $76k · revenue +43%
  • MM
    MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +132%
  • UC
    UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF WEST CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +443%

Funded once

  • MC
    MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +435%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • RG
    RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.

Health
2
Marshfield Clinic Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
3
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
4
Mchs Hospitals Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
5
Beaver Dam Community Hospitals Foundation Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through meaningful relationships built on gratitude and philanthropy.

Health
6
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
7
Dickinson County Healthcare System

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
8
Lakeview Medical Center Inc of Rice Lake

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
9
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Beaver Dam Community Hospitals Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
11
Memorial Hospital Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
12
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Personal Development Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UW RIVER FALLS FOUNDATION: $95,000 · OtherUW RIVER FALLS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $87,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOUR SAVIORS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $48,000 · OtherOUR SAVIORS LUTHERAN CHURCHGREENWOOD HIGH SCHOOL: $21,500 · OtherGREENWOOD HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+12 more: $28,596 · Other+12 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $76,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCO…MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthMARSHFIELD CLIN…MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER INC: $10,000 · HealthMEMORIAL MEDICA…RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY: $10,000 · EnvironmentDAIRY CARES OF WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyROCK CREEK DISABLED OUTDOORS INC: $1,200 · Human ServicesPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $250 · Human Services
Other$295,596Education$76,000Health$60,000Environment$10,000Philanthropy$5,000Human Services$1,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $76,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF WEST CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDAIRY CARES OF WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetROCK CREEK DISABLED OUTDOORS INC: $1,200 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RUFFED GROUSE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF WEST CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds DAIRY CARES OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK CREEK DISABLED OUTDOORS INC ↗
  • Who funds PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wuethrich Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wuethrich Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wuethrich’s filings →

    More from the funding graph