· Private foundation
Wr & Floy a Sauey Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k29 grants · $106k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $126k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REEDSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY | $100,000 |
| SPRING HILL EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $27,300 |
| HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER | $20,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - WISCONSIN RIVER AREA | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| RAVENWOOD HEALTH | $10,000 |
| BEYOND BLESSED FOOD PANTRY | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,500 |
| BARABOO HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETICS CO TRACK AND FIELD | $6,500 |
| ECUMENICAL ASSEMBLY OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY CHURCHES | $5,000 |
| PORTAGE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT | $5,000 |
| KIDSCOMMON | $5,000 |
| SPRING HILL FOOD PANTRY | $3,850 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $169k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
60 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 41 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $203k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2021–2023 · $299k · revenue +31%- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC3× · 2017–2019 · $133k · revenue +310%
- SHSPRING HILL EDUCATION FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2025 · $89k · revenue +50% · 25% of their budget
Funded once
- ARAL RINGLING THEATREone grant, 2018 · $75k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $70k
- CHCARDINAL HUSKIES ATHLETIC DEPARTMENTone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide safety, shelter and support to empower all impacted by domestic abuse, sexual violence, child abuse & trafficking.
To provide shelter, crisis intervention, and supportive services for survivors of domestic and sexual abuse and their families, with a commitment to safety, respect and promoting self-determination.
House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…
Formerly ywca wichita, the wichita family crisis center (wfcc) began operations in wichita, ks in 1907. wfcc's mission is to eliminate domestic violence in our community by supporting survivors through shelter, education & advocacy.
We provide food, household and personal items as available to combat food scarcity and poverty in our community.
To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…
The Crisis Center of Russell County was organized to provide assistance and temporary housing to victims of domestic abuse through secured temporary housing and education with job placement to transition them back into society. In…
Provide support, resources, and hope for a better future to persons affected by domestic abuse, sexual assault and other crisis.
The Hope Center seeks out and teams with volunteers from congregations of many faiths.The Center is committed to serving people in need in Waukesha County, Wisconsin through financial assistance, food, child care, clothing and…
The House of Hope is dedicated to serving individuals, families, and our community by providing a hand up into a hope-filled future.
The center's mission is to advocate and support social change that will result in non-violent relationships, homes and communities through public education, direct services, a haven and programs related to the issues of domestic and sexual…
Choices of manistee county, inc. provides emergency shelter, crisis intervention, counseling, advocacy, and education to survivors of domestic violence in manistee county, empowering survivors to achieve safety and self-determination.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cal Center Presents. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 253 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds SPRING HILL EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds People Helping People ↗
- Who funds THE UW-PLATTEVILLE FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE AND HEALING SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Turning Point Inc ↗
- Who funds Chrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFEHOME INC ↗
- Who funds VERNON AREA REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER AREA INC ↗
- Who funds BARABOO AREA HOMELESS SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Circle Of Love Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WEST CENTRAL WIS ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The Covia Foundation · Seneca Foods Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Akron Community Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · United Way of Geauga County · Culver's Foundation Inc · Second Harvest Foodbank of Southern Wi · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · Otto Bremer Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wr & Floy a Sauey Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.