Skip to content
Worthwhile Life Incorporated F/K/A Mohawk Rubber Charitable at a glance

· Private foundation

Worthwhile Life Incorporated F/K/A Mohawk Rubber Charitable

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$111kHealth$75kRecreation & Sports$19kHuman Services$9kInternational$6kReligion$5kPhilanthropy$5kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $33k
$32,787
Median grant
1
States reached
$108k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$32,787
THE JIMMY FUND$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%CASA OF LUZERNE: $750 → 15%LOST-N-FOUND YOUTH INC: $2k → 13%GREG HILL FOUNDATION: $4k → 8%HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN INC: $1k → 16%LOVE LIFE NOW FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
MD
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$308k · 8 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
54

Total granted

$308k
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+19%

Still filing today

38%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationEmploymentRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    7× · 2017–2024 · $255k
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $42k · revenue +123%
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $49k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYMAKING STRIDES AGAINST BREAST CANCER
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • MY
    MA YOUTH SPORTS AED PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $16k · 56% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
2
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—
3
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
4
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
5
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Conquer cancer funds research for every type of cancer to benefit every patient, everywhere. working in collaboration with a global network of top scientists and clinicians, and leading advocacy and research organizations, conquer cancer…

Health
7
Head for the Cure Foundation

The mission of the head for the cure foundation (hftc) is threefold: to build awareness, raise funding, and inspire hope for the community of brain cancer patients, their families, friends, caregivers and other supporters, while…

Health
8
Cog Research Foundation Llc

Cog research foundation, llc is a california 501(c)(3) entity founded in 2024 and designed to become the federal grantee organization for the children's oncology group (cog). the cog, a member of the national cancer institute (nci)…

Health
9
Hippocratic Cancer Research Foundation Inc

Accelerate and increase impact of scientific discoveries within cancer biology and oncology.

Health
10
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
11
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Tripp Healy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
16/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $255,478 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $48,909 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYMAKING STRIDES AGAINST BREAST CANCER: $16,100 · Other+38 more: $51,180 · Other+38 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $41,500 · HealthDana-Farber…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,500 · HealthAMERICAN CA…+6 more: $2,850 · Health+6 moreMA YOUTH SPORTS AED PROGRAM INC: $16,000 · Recreation & SportsGREG HILL FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesBEAR BE A RESOURCE FOR CPS KIDS: $2,510 · Human ServicesLost-N-Found Youth Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $1,000 · Human ServicesLOVE LIFE NOW FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCAPE COD MILITARY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF WYOMING VALLEY: $750 · Human ServicesSOUTH SHORE BANK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $3,467 · EmploymentTHE TRIPP HEALY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $350 · EducationROLLING WAVE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Public BenefitMEDICINES FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,100 · International
Other$371,667Health$47,850Recreation & Sports$16,000Human Services$11,260Employment$3,467Education$2,350Public Benefit$2,000International$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $41,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMA YOUTH SPORTS AED PROGRAM INC: $16,000 over 1y, 56% of budgetGREG HILL FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR BE A RESOURCE FOR CPS KIDS: $2,510 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROLLING WAVE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLost-N-Found Youth Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICINES FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSupport the Soupman Corp: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHARING INC KAY DOHERTY PRESIDENT: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLOVE LIFE NOW FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE COD MILITARY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOVE INC: $795 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF WYOMING VALLEY: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE MISSION INC: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND PARKINSONS RIDE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC: $162 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACH TREE HEALTHCARE: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Tower Corpor…Eastern Bank Foundati…Citizens Charitable F…Boston Foundation IncCharities Aid Foundat…The Chicago Community…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Verizon FoundationThe Bank of America C…The Blackbaud Giving …Paypal Charitable Giv…Raymond James Charita…
American Tower Corporation Foundation IncMA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Chicago Community Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Worthwhile Life Incorporated F/K/A Mohawk Rubber Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Worthwhile Life Incorporated F/K/A Mohawk Rubber Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dove Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Horizons for Homeless Children: 21% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The New England Center for Children Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Worthwhile Life Incorporated F/K/A Mohawk Rubber’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home