Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

World Hunger Ecumenical Arizona Task Force Inc

The mission of WHEAT is to educate, advocate, engage and empower individuals to action in the fight against hunger and poverty.

$24M
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$11M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212023.

Health$17MInternational$15MHuman Services$8.8MReligion$3.0MFood & Nutrition$367kHousing & Shelter$75k
02FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $630k
  • $250k+8 grants · $24M
$641,074
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Regional Center for Border Health Inc$10,608,681
International Rescue Committee$6,462,057
Helping With All My Heart Inc$2,000,383
Monte Vista Baptist Church dba$1,806,300
Tongan United Methodist Church$985,133
St Vincent dePaul Society$796,776
One Hundred Angels$641,074
Iglesia Cristiana el buen Pastor AZ$526,005
Pilgrim Rest Foundation$197,948
Central United Methodist Church$115,263
Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest$106,556
City of Douglas$75,000
First Church of United Church of Christ Phoenix$69,687
Discipulos del Reino$66,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Helping With All My Heart Inc: $2.0M → 11%Helping With All My Heart Inc: $553k → 11%One Hundred Angels: $641k → 11%One Hundred Angels: $554k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44M · 10 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$44M
$60k

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $15M · revenue +38%
  • DC
    DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2.0M · revenue +11%
  • WH
    WORLD HUNGER ECUMENICAL ARIZONA TASK FORCE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $770k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2021 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities Diocese of San Diego

Catholic Charities provides social services and administers various governmental and social programs. Designed to meet the challenge of the ever-changing community by utilizing spiritual, human and financial resources, our programs enable…

Human Services
2
Voices From the Border

Providing humanitarian aid to asylum seekers and migrants at the southern border of Arizona and Mexico

Human Services
3
Caring Ministries Inc

Food and clothing distribution along the arizona/mexico border and southern arizona. provide living quarters for volunteer missionaries who have no other place to live and to provide support to orphanages.

Religion
4
House of Refuge Sunnyslope Inc

Our mission is to love, house, and equip men, women and children. coming from chronic unemployment, recovery, or an endless cycle of homelessness, our residents experience a clean, safe home where transforming their life can begin.…

Housing & Shelter
5
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
6
The Inn of Southern Arizona Inc

Provide a caring ministry for migrants passing throught the us/mexico border

Human Services
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
Matthew House Az Inc

Matthew House exists to build bridges between refugee and immigrant families and the communities to which they come. Matthew House provides a bridge via housing solutions, language and tutoring programs, cultural mentorship and employment…

Education
9
Armadillos Search and Rescue O

Search and rescue of migrants stranded in the dessert providing first aid and water for their survival and guidance for safe arrival

10
Fellowship Southwest

Fellowship Southwest is an ecumenical regional network of Christians and partner ministries promoting compassion, justice and connection throughout the Southwest US. Our ministry includes a network of pastors serving migrants on both sides…

Religion
11
Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona Inc

Catholic Community Services provides a wide range of services and programs to children, older adults, individuals, families, and people with disabilities. These program and services have specific goals for each group and CCS reviews the…

12
Justa Center Inc

A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGIONAL CENTER FOR BORDER HEALTH INC — $17,416,670 · HealthREGIONAL CENTER FOR BORDER HEALTH INCInternational Rescue Committee INC — $14,900,028 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCWORLD HUNGER ECUMENICAL ARIZONA TASK FORCE INC — $770,198 · InternationalMONTE VISTA CROSS CULTURAL CHURCH — $2,933,147 · OtherMONTE VISTA C…Tongan United Methodist Church — $985,133 · OtherTongan United…Iglesia Cristiana el buen Pastor AZ — $809,958 · OtherIglesia Crist…CENTRAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $501,164 · OtherCENTRAL UNITE…+3 more — $196,134 · OtherHELPING WITH ALL MY HEART INC — $2,553,125 · Human ServicesHELPING W…ONE HUNDRED ANGELS — $1,194,812 · Human ServicesONE HUNDR…DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $1,965,236 · ReligionLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST — $497,818 · ReligionPILGRIM REST FOUNDATION INC — $197,948 · ReligionCITY OF DOUGLAS COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPOR — $75,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$17,416,670International$15,670,226Other$5,425,536Human Services$3,747,937Religion$2,661,002Housing & Shelter$75,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREGIONAL CENTER FOR BORDER HEALTH INC — $17,416,670 over 2y, 53% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $14,900,028 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $1,965,236 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetWORLD HUNGER ECUMENICAL ARIZONA TASK FORCE INC — $770,198 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST — $497,818 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPILGRIM REST FOUNDATION INC — $197,948 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCITY OF DOUGLAS COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPOR — $75,000 over 1y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Grand Canyon University CityServe · Save The Children Federation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization World Hunger Ecumenical Arizona Task Force Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to World Hunger Ecumenical Arizona Task Force Inc?

    Find your warmest path to World Hunger Ecumenical Arizona Task Force Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph