· Public charity
Workmoney Foundation Inc
Workmoney foundation, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
- $250k+7 grants · $69M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WORKMONEY INC | $63,390,000 |
| NORTH MAIN STREET FUND | $3,000,000 |
| DEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER INSTITUTE | $1,000,000 |
| VOTING RIGHTS LAB | $850,000 |
| BLACK PROGRESSIVE ACTION COALITION EDUCATION FUND | $400,000 |
| PUSHBLACK | $350,000 |
| PARENTSTOGETHER FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| SPREAD THE VOTE | $100,000 |
| ROCK THE VOTE | $100,000 |
| CULTURE CHANGING CHRISTIANS | $100,000 |
| ALL AMERICANS VOTE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to leverage web-technologies to improve civic engagement and voter education.
Secure Democracy USA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that works to build stronger elections, state by state.
Founded in 1998, dc vote is a national citizen engagement and advocacy organization dedicated to strengthening democracy and securing equality for all in the district of columbia.
Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.
Conduct digital, direct mail and other public communication campaigns to support voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts.
Organize general election presidential and vice-presidential debates
Our goal is to increase power in our communities through effective voting. We increase voter registration and help develop voting infrastructure and to pursue policies that expands access to the ballot.
Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…
The Organization was established to coordinate and promote progressive issues, policies, initiatives, and referenda, and to pursue electoral reform that expands access to the ballot.
Supports Measure to Remove Lawmakers Power to Set Their Own Pay
To educate the public regarding its proposal to implement a Nationwide Popular Vote Election of the President of the United States
The mission of voteamerica is to strengthen united states democracy by increasing voter turnout.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rock the Vote and the most unlike its peers is Black Progressive Action Coalition Education Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WORKMONEY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH MAIN STREET FUND ↗
- Who funds DEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SD Foundation ↗
- Who funds BLACK PROGRESSIVE ACTION COALITION EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds PUSHBLACK ↗
- Who funds ParentsTogether Foundation ↗
- Who funds ROCK THE VOTE ↗
- Who funds SPREAD THE VOTE INC ↗
- Who funds CULTURE CHANGING CHRISTIANS WORSHIP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds All Americans Vote ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · New Venture Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Tides Foundation · Hopewell Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Chicago Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Workmoney Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Workmoney Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Workmoney Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.