Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Virginia · Public charity

Woodbridge Lodge No 583

The organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence and charity. This is accomplished through a year-round schedule of social and recreational activities for the members and their families estimated at 700.

$183k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
8
Itemized grants FY2026
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2026
$78k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2026
$9,200
Largest grant, FY2026
$15,500
States reached, FY2026
2
Total assets, FY2026
$4.7M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2026 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Moose International Inc$15,5001n/a
Lorton Community Action Center Inc$14,0001n/a
Action in Community Through Service of Prince William$11,5001n/a
South County Athletic Association$9,2001n/a
United Community Ministries Inc$8,0001n/a
Northern Virginia Vietnam Veterans Foundation$8,0001n/a
Food for Others Inc$6,0001n/a
Pohick Episcopal Church$6,0001n/a

Compare Woodbridge Lodge No 583 with peer funders

About Woodbridge Lodge No 583

How much does Woodbridge Lodge No 583 give?
Woodbridge Lodge No 583 reported 8 itemized grants totaling $78,200, out of $183,383 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2026 IRS filing.
Who are Woodbridge Lodge No 583's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2026 to FY2026: Moose International Inc ($16k), Lorton Community Action Center Inc ($14k), Action in Community Through Service of Prince William ($12k).
Where is Woodbridge Lodge No 583 based?
Woodbridge Lodge No 583 is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Woodbridge Lodge No 583’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home