· Public charity
Women Win Foundation Inc
We apply innovative ways to keep advancing girls and womens rights in the broadest sense of the word.
Read this first · the figures below need context
50% of Women Win Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Astraea Foundation Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASTREA | $20,000 |
| Soccer Without Borders | $10,000 |
| Skate Like A Girl | $9,995 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Grants abroad, by region: $746k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: We apply innovative ways to keep advancing girls and womens rights in the broadest sense. We do this by empowering adolescent girls and young women to exercise their rights through sport and play and build impactful, cross-sector partnerships between womens rights organisations and corporate stakeholders through participatory design and play-based implementation.
Stated purpose: We apply innovative ways to keep advancing girls and womens rights in the broadest sense. We do this by empowering adolescent girls and young women to exercise their rights through sport and play and build impactful, cross-sector partnerships between womens rights organisations and corporate stakeholders through participatory design and play-based implementation.
Stated purpose: We apply innovative ways to keep advancing girls and womens rights in the broadest sense. We do this by empowering adolescent girls and young women to exercise their rights through sport and play and build impactful, cross-sector partnerships between womens rights organisations and corporate stakeholders through participatory design and play-based implementation.
Stated purpose: We apply innovative ways to keep advancing girls and womens rights in the broadest sense. We do this by empowering adolescent girls and young women to exercise their rights through sport and play and build impactful, cross-sector partnerships between womens rights organisations and corporate stakeholders through participatory design and play-based implementation.
Stated purpose: We apply innovative ways to keep advancing girls and womens rights in the broadest sense. We do this by empowering adolescent girls and young women to exercise their rights through sport and play and build impactful, cross-sector partnerships between womens rights organisations and corporate stakeholders through participatory design and play-based implementation.
How this is measured
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Women Win Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Women Win Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Women Win’s filings →