Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wlg Charitable Foundation 2556-11-15

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$763k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$513k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of Wlg Charitable Foundation 2556-11-15’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Philadelphia Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
20
1
21
2
23
3
24
4
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$613kEducation$500kScience & Tech$312kEnvironment$300kCrime & Legal$100kHealth$50kArts & Culture$50kFood & Nutrition$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $250k
  • $250k+1 grant · $513k
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION$512,803
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$50,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$50,000
THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$50,000
THE BOSTON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE$50,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK: $50k → 16%THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $513k → 22%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE: $200k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $50k → 14%EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $100k → 18%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 16%THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $100k → 22%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE: $100k → 17%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $50k → 18%THE BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $200k → 16%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $50k → 17%THE BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY: $100k → 16%MUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTON: $252k → 16%TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $150k → 16%THE BOSTON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $50k → 16%TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%THE BOSTON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $10k → 16%WGBH EDUCATIONAL FDN: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$860k · 4 repeat orgs$652k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$860k
$452k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-4%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentHealthCivil RightsCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $300k · revenue +29%
  • TB
    THE BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $300k
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTON
    one grant, 2020 · $252k
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -40%
  • BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Business Executives for National Security

Bens applies industry experience and best business practices to help address our nation's pressing national security challenges.

International
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
7
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
8
Free Press

Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…

Arts & Culture
9
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
10
Boston Foundation Inc

As Greater Boston's community foundation, the Boston Foundation devotes its resources to expanding opportunities, improving lives and strengthening communities. See Schedule OThe Foundation fulfills this mission in three principal ways:…

Philanthropy
11
Boston Medical Center Health Plan Inc

The corporation is organized and operates as a nonprofit corporation exclusively for the benefit of and to support boston medical center corporation and to provide access to effective, efficient medical care among low income, underserved,…

Health
12
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boston Medical Center Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Wgbh Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY — $300,000 · OtherTHE BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARYMUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTON — $252,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF SCIENCE BOSTONTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $200,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYTHE BOSTON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE — $60,000 · OtherTHE BOSTON MUSEUM OF SCIENCEGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $612,803 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATIONNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $300,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCE…EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $100,000 · Civil RightsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $50,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $50,000 · InternationalBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $50,000 · HealthWGBH Educational Foundation — $50,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $50,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$862,000Philanthropy$612,803Environment$300,000Civil Rights$100,000International$100,000Health$50,000Arts & Culture$50,000Crime & Legal$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $612,803 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $300,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wlg Charitable Foundation 2556-11-15 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 22%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph