Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wisner Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$129kArts & Culture$52kReligion$41kHuman Services$23kYouth Development$16kHealth$13kRecreation & Sports$9k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$443k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEMENTIA FRIENDLY SALINE$5,000
MONA SHORES HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
SCHOOL CRAFT COMMUNITY SCHOOL$5,000
BABY READ$5,000
MILWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
BRIEF$5,000
MONA SHORES PARENT ASSOC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,161
BUILDING BEDS 4 KIDS$4,110
Individual grant recipient$4,037
Individual grant recipient$3,000
BRISTOW RUN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,900
LAKE HARBOR UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$530
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BARKER ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%THE BARKER ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%PROGRAM TO EDUCATE ALL CYCLISTS: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$131k · 11 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
35

Total granted

$131k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+76%

Still filing today

36%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LW
    LEST WE FORGET OUR VETS INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $14k · revenue +19% · 77% of their budget
  • TB
    The Barker Adoption Foundation
    2× · 2018–2020 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • H
    HEARD
    2× · 2019–2023 · $10k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • AH
    AL HOLMES ACADEMY
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • WS
    WOODWARD SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • CP
    CEDAR POINT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kenmore Pta

Through the efforts of committed volunteers, Kenmore Elementary PTA is dedicated to providing support services, learning opportunities, and community events to create a positive educational environment and school community for students,…

—
2
Ketterlinus Elementary Pto Inc

The ketterlinus elementary school pto exists to promote the educational welfare and development of the students at ketterlinus elementary school, to support united efforts among educators and parents for the benefit of the students, and to…

Education
3
Benton Elementary Pto
Education
4
Bellview Elementary Parent Teacher Association

Parent Teacher Association

—
5
Lakewood Elementary Ptt

The sole purpose of lakewood elementary ptt is to foster pride, enthusiasm and positive action to support learning. through fundraising and family activities, lakewood elementary ptt will promote school/community relationships that enhance…

Education
6
Lincoln Elementary Pta

Lincoln elementary scholl pta mission is to support and speak on behalf of children and youth in the schools, in the community, and before governmental bodies and other organizations that make decisions affecting children; to assist…

—
7
Pender Pto

The purpose of the pender pto is to support the education of children in the pender public schools by fostering relationships among the school, parents and teachers.

Education
8
Berkley Elementary Pto

PTO to support and fund activities at Berkley Elementary school.

Education
9
North Lee Elementary Pto

To foster a sense of support, pride, and enthusiasm; to encourage parent and community involvement in the north lee area; and to strengthen the connection between home and school so that parents and teachers can work together effectively…

Education
10
Laketown Elementary School Pto

The purpose of laketown elementary school pto is to support the education of children at laketown elementary school by fostering the relationship between school, home, and community for the academic success of all the students of the…

Education
11
Washington Elementary Pta

The purpose of the Washington Elementary PTA is to promote the welfare of children in the home, school, and community and, raise standards of home life, connect home and school, and connect educators and the general public. The Washington…

—
12
Bennie Elementary Pta

The primary exempt purpose of a Parent Teacher Association (PTA) is to promote the welfare, health, safety, and educational success of children and youth through strong parent, family, school, and community involvement

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kalamazoo Children's Chorus; the most unlike its peers is Piney Branch Elementary School Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $33,400 · OtherMILWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $10,127 · OtherPORTAGE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10,047 · OtherBRIEF: $9,930 · OtherAL HOLMES ACADEMY: $9,330 · OtherSUNNYSIDE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7,400 · Other+39 more: $137,637 · Other+39 moreKALAMAZOO CHILDREN'S CHORUS: $15,000 · Arts & CultureKALAMAZOO C…LEST WE FORGET OUR VETS INC: $14,450 · Arts & CultureLEST WE FOR…HEARD: $10,000 · EducationKALAMAZOO LITERACY COUNCIL: $2,500 · EducationPINEY BRANCH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $2,373 · EducationBENNETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $1,000 · EducationThe Barker Adoption Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesPrograms to Educate All Cyclists: $4,000 · Human ServicesDEMENTIA FRIENDLY SALINE: $5,000 · HealthLENDING HANDS OF MICHIGAN INC: $2,050 · Health
Other$217,871Arts & Culture$29,450Education$15,873Human Services$14,000Health$7,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKALAMAZOO CHILDREN'S CHORUS: $15,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetLEST WE FORGET OUR VETS INC: $14,450 over 4y, 77% of budgetThe Barker Adoption Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHEARD: $10,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetDEMENTIA FRIENDLY SALINE: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPrograms to Educate All Cyclists: $4,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKALAMAZOO LITERACY COUNCIL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLENDING HANDS OF MICHIGAN INC: $2,050 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBENNETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO: $1,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetbelmont elementary school pta: $560 over 1y, 58% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KALAMAZOO CHILDREN'S CHORUS ↗
  • Who funds LEST WE FORGET OUR VETS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Barker Adoption Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HEARD ↗
  • Who funds DEMENTIA FRIENDLY SALINE ↗
  • Who funds Programs to Educate All Cyclists ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds PINEY BRANCH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kalamazoo Community FoundationMI17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kalamazoo Community Foundation · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · John E Fetzer Institute Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wisner Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wisner Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wisner Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph