Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wishful Wings James S Barnett Jr 12706800

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$49kReligion$32kCrime & Legal$21kEnvironment$18kCivil Rights$10kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE$5,000
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
BROADWAY BAPTIST CHURCH$4,000
INTERTRIBAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS$4,000
GLASSTIRE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MIGIZI: $3k → 11%CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $5k → 10%INTL PEDIATRIC STROKE ORG: $2k → 10%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5k → 7%CENTER FOR INQUIRY: $3k → 13%NAACP LEGAL DEFENCE & EDUCATION FD: $5k → 17%THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION: $5k → 20%COOK CHILDRENS HEALTH FDN: $2k → 11%FAITH IN TEXAS: $5k → 14%BROADWAY BAPTIST CHURCH: $4k → 18%EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $5k → 18%IDA B WELLS SOCIETY FOR INVESTIGATIVE: $3k → 13%MIGIZI: $3k → 11%CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $5k → 10%TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $3k → 7%NATIONAL BLACK LEADERSHIP: $4k → 17%VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE: $5k → 20%BASIS BENBROOK: $4k → 11%BROADWAY BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 18%CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $3k → 10%THE MARSHALL PROJECT: $5k → 17%ART COUNCIL OF FORT WORTH: $3k → 11%BROADWAY BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 18%CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $3k → 10%CAMPAIGN ZERO: $5k → 17%ART COUNCIL OF FORT WORTH: $3k → 11%BROADWAY BAPTIST CHURCH: $3k → 18%CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
SD
CA
MD
NC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91k · 9 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
13

Total granted

$91k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-7%

Still filing today

22%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCivil RightsCrime & LegalEnvironmentReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CJ
    CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue -46%
  • BB
    BROADWAY BAPTIST CHURCH OF FORT WORTH TX INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $13k
  • G
    Glasstire
    5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue ×11
  • NL
    NAACP LEGAL DEFENCE & EDUCATION FD
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • FI
    FAITH IN TEXAS - PICO
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Equal Justice Society

The Equal Justice Society (EJS) is transforming the nations consciousness on racethrough law, social science, and the arts. EJS works to dismantle structural andinstitutional racism to advance robust equal protection under the Fourteenth…

Civil Rights
2
Alliance for Justice

Alliance for justice builds the strength of progressive movements by training and educating nonprofit organizations on advocacy, while harnessing their collective power to transform our state and federal courts.

Civil Rights
3
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
6
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
7
The Promise of Justice Initiative

The promise of justice initiative works to create positive change for people in the criminal legal system at the intersection of impact litigation, direct services and community engagement.

Crime & Legal
8
Injustice Watch Nfp

Injustice Watch is a Chicago-based nonprofit journalism organization that examines issues of equity and justice in the court system.

Civil Rights
9
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
10
First Look Institute Inc

First Look Institute supports fearless investigative journalism, innovative and cinematic nonfiction filmmaking, and press freedom initiatives to protect the right to a free and open society and press.

Arts & Culture
11
Measures for Justice Institute

Measures for Justice is a nonpartisan nonprofit that develops data tools that help communities, including the institutions that serve them, reshape how the criminal justice system works.

Civil Rights
12
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Marshall Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Faith in Texas - Pico. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROADWAY BAPTIST CHURCH OF FORT WORTH TX INC: $13,000 · OtherBROADWAY BAPTIST CHURCH OF FORT WORTH TX INCAFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL HERITAGE: $11,000 · OtherAFRICAN AMERICAN CULTURAL HERITAGETRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $8,000 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCHINTERTRIBAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS: $8,000 · OtherINTERTRIBAL COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF TEXASUT ARLINGTON ARTART HISTORY DEPT: $7,500 · OtherUT ARLINGTON ARTART HISTORY DEPTMIGIZI: $6,000 · OtherMIGIZIART COUNCIL OF FORT WORTH: $6,000 · OtherART COUNCIL OF FORT WORTHNAACP LEGAL DEFENCE & EDUCATION FD: $5,000 · OtherNAACP LEGAL DEFENCE & EDUCATION FDCAMPAIGN ZERO: $5,000 · OtherCAMPAIGN ZEROIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIDA B WELLS SOCIETY FOR INVESTIGATIVE: $3,000 · Other+2 more: $4,000 · OtherCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $18,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE JUSTI…Glasstire: $13,000 · Arts & CultureGlasstireCENTER FOR INQUIRY INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR I…THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $5,000 · Civil RightsVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalNative American Heritage Association: $3,000 · Crime & LegalFAITH IN TEXAS - PICO: $5,000 · ReligionTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$84,500Environment$18,000Arts & Culture$16,000Civil Rights$10,000Crime & Legal$8,000Religion$5,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGlasstire: $13,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFAITH IN TEXAS - PICO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR INQUIRY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNative American Heritage Association: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Glasstire ↗
  • Who funds THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN TEXAS - PICO ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INQUIRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Native American Heritage Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wishful Wings James S Barnett Jr 12706800 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wishful Wings James S Barnett Jr 12706800. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wishful Wings James S Barnett Jr 12706800?

    Find your warmest path to Wishful Wings James S Barnett Jr 12706800 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wishful Wings James S Barnett Jr 12706800’s filings →

    More from the funding graph