Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wise-Vettese Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$179kHousing & Shelter$113kYouth Development$85kPublic Safety & Disaster$73kEducation$56kArts & Culture$54kPhilanthropy$43kCommunity Improvement$41kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$138k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MDR ROTARY CLUB$10,000
ST JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE$6,050
MCCALLUM THEATER$5,000
THE PEOPLE CONCERN$5,000
JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$3,000
PALM SPRINGS OPERA GUILD$2,000
UNICEF$2,000
THE TJ MARTEL FOUNDATION$1,350
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCE$1,000
ANT-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ADL$1,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,000
HO'OLA FARMS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%HIDDEN WATER: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $21k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $20k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $18k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $15k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $8k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $5k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$682k · 18 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
19

Total granted

$682k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+77%

Still filing today

67%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +100%
  • TP
    THE PEOPLE CONCERN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +696%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    9× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Centergraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +77%
  • MR
    METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • MT
    MAUI THERAPY ANIMALS
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
University of Hawaii Foundation

To unite donors' passions with the university of hawai'i's (uh) aspirations by raising philanthropic support and managing investments to benefit uh, the people of hawai'i and our future generations.

Education
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating a cure for each and every multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies,…

Health
7
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
8
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
10
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
11
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hoola Veteran Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE: $89,060 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF VENICEMCCALLUM THEATER: $45,000 · OtherMCCALLUM THEATERCITY OF HOPE: $41,400 · OtherCITY OF HOPEJEWISH FEDERATION: $35,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONMDR ROTARY CLUB: $10,000 · Other+19 more: $36,150 · Other+19 moreTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $118,218 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERNAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $78,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross &…+2 more: $1,400 · Human ServicesSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $159,663 · HealthSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FO…Eisenhower Medical Center: $10,000 · HealthMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $10,000 · HealthTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8,250 · Health+4 more: $4,100 · HealthJohn Carroll University: $50,000 · EducationJohn Carro…RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL: $10,000 · EducationRANCHO MIR…HOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $9,000 · EducationHOFFMAN IN…MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EducationUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $17,000 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 · InternationalCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionAmazon Watch Inc: $100 · Environment
Other$256,610Human Services$197,618Health$192,013Education$72,000International$18,000Philanthropy$8,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Environment$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $159,663 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $118,218 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $78,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJohn Carroll University: $50,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMAUI THERAPY ANIMALS: $5,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAKU BALDWIN CENTER INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIDDEN WATER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYA SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmazon Watch Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds John Carroll University ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds HOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAUI THERAPY ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAKU BALDWIN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TJ MARTELL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Hoola Veteran Services ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN WATER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PLAYA SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wise-Vettese Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wise-Vettese Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Wise-Vettese Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Wise-Vettese Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wise-Vettese Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph