Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
To create a strong, effective statewide network of local adult, family, and workplace literacy providers.
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 9%. 63% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To create a strong, effective statewide network of local adult, family, and workplace literacy providers.
To teach adults to read, write and speak english.
To build communities that value diversity and inclusion through serving as the intercultural bridge that strengthens bonds, educates, and empowers ethnically diverse communities.
Lcfbc helps families by raising adult literacy skills, thereby improving economic outlook and quality of life. lcfbc is dedicated to combating functional illiteracy created by the inability to read, write or speak english. programs include…
To Provide Accessible and Customized Tutoring in Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Understanding English to Help Adults Achieve Independence.
Literacy volunteers of greater hartford (lvgh) teaches adults to read, write and speak english in order to improve their lives and enhance their roles within their family and community.
To provide adults with essential literacy skills for english learners and native english speakers.
To provide english as a second language, adult literacy, and family literacy instruction, as well as other educational counseling, assessment, referrals, college transition, and other vocational and educational services.
The literacy council of norristown supports adult learners to learn reading, writing, and math, and to prepare for their ged, learn english, and become citizens.
We develop literacy skills by providing free tutoring in erie and niagara counties through engagement and training of diverse community volunteers.
Empowering individuals to overcome health, education and economic barriers. embracing cultures with cultural and language interpretation. strengthening community with individuals equipped for success.
Multicultural educational and resources.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Literacy Services of Wisconsin Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pointters Community Initatives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · United Way Fox Cities Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & · Greater Green Bay Community · Hunger Task Force Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Church Mutual Insurance Company
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Every dot is one organisation WISCONSIN LITERACY INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Through Plinth
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: COMMUNITY CENTER FOR IMMIGRANTS INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.1× since.
US 501(c)(3); EIN 862166259 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on COMMUNITY CENTER FOR IMMIGRANTS INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to Wisconsin Literacy Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.