Skip to content

· Public charity

Wisconsin Bankers Association

We actively advocate, educate and support our members to help them positively impact the wisconsin communities they serve.

$399k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$1.4MEmployment$545kCommunity Improvement$97kHousing & Shelter$65kArts & Culture$40kYouth Development$15kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k17 grants · $227k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $167k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOBS FIRST COALITION$100,000
WISCONSIN PRINCIPLES INC$67,000
WISCONSIN MANUFACTURERS AND COMMERCE-ISSUES MOBILIZATION FUND$25,000
CENTER FOR INNOVATIVE POLICY$20,000
STATE GOVERNNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$20,000
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF WISCONSIN$17,000
EMPLOY MILWAUKEE INC$15,000
COMMITTEE TO ELECT A REPUBLICAN SENATE$12,000
REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLY CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$12,000
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF WISCONSIN$12,000
ASSEMBLY DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$12,000
STATE SENATE DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE$12,000
BAY BANK$10,000
PREMIER BANK$10,000
THE BANK OF NEW GLARUS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SHEBOYGAN: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 12 repeat orgs$321k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
15

Total granted

$1.9M
$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

58%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentCivil RightsPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JOBS FIRST COALITION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $505k · revenue +36%
  • WA
    Wisconsin Alliance for Reform Inc
    5× · 2019–2023 · $361k · revenue +196% · 41% of their budget
  • WI
    WMC ISSUES MOBILIZATION COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +506%

Funded once

  • PG
    PLATFORM GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING INC
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • RS
    Republican State Leadership
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF METRO MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
Wisconsin Progress Inc

Wisconsin progress recruits, trains, elects, and develops progressive candidates and leaders at the local and state legislative levels.

Civil Rights
3
Wisconsin Progress Institute Inc

Wisconsin progress institute exists to empower wisconsin's locally elected leaders with the tools, training, and support they need to be effective, values-driven public servants.

Education
4
One Wisconsin Now Inc

To advance progressive values, ideas and policies through research, policy, networking, advocacy and public education.

—
5
Public Policy Forum Inc Researching Community Issues

We seek, discover, and disclose true and accurate information to enhance the effectiveness of government and public policy in southeastern Wisconsin; and we facilitate public policy discussion and action.

—
6
Wisconsin Center for Manufacturing & Productivity

The wcmp will grow and nurture the mep's impact in the state of wisconsin by engaging and aligning the best possible resources to help small and medium-sized manufacturers reach their potential.

Education
7
Law Forward Inc

To preserve fundamental democratic principles, support wisconsin's commitment to clean and open government, and promote a progressive vision through impact litigation, administrative processes and public education.

Crime & Legal
8
Wisconsin Opportunity Coalition Inc

We are organized to support public policy that protects public education, the environment, the rights of all citizens and expands economic opportunity and fairness for everyone.

Civil Rights
9
Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce Inc

Founded in 1911, our mission is to make wisconsin the most competitive state in the nation to do business. we are wisconsin's business voice.

—
10
Wisconsineye Public Affairs Network Inc

To keep state residents educated and informed, in a nonpartisan manner, on a broad range of wisconsin public issues and policy matters.

Arts & Culture
11
Wisconsin Women's Business Initiative Corporation

Wwbic opens the doors of opportunity by providing any individuals who are interested in starting, strengthening, or expanding businesses with access to resources such as financial products and quality business and personal financial…

—
12
Wisconsin Voices Inc

Wisconsin voices provides technical assistance and resources to build capacity and leadership to 501(c)(3) organizations in support of commonly held values of equal opportunity, freedom, progress, and a government that works for all.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Principles Inc; the most unlike its peers is 1848 Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COUNCIL FOR SOUND TAX POLICY INC: $370,000 · OtherCOUNCIL FOR SOUND TAX POLICY INCWisconsin Alliance for Reform Inc: $360,600 · OtherWisconsin Alliance for Reform IncWMC ISSUES MOBILIZATION COUNCIL INC: $200,000 · OtherWMC ISSUES MOBILIZATION COUNCIL INCREPUBLICAN PARTY OF WISCONSIN: $87,000 · OtherREPUBLICAN PARTY OF WISCONSINCERS: $51,210 · Other+22 more: $307,000 · Other+22 moreTHE JOBS FIRST COALITION INC: $505,000 · EmploymentTHE JOBS FIRST COALITION INCEMPLOY MILWAUKEE INC: $40,000 · EmploymentEMPLOY MILWAUKEE INCWISCONSIN PRINCIPLES INC: $142,000 · Civil Rights1848 PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsSTATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Public BenefitNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES: $10,000 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR INNOVATIVE POLICY: $20,000 · InternationalMIDWEST GROWTH INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SHEBOYGAN INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$1,375,810Employment$545,000Civil Rights$152,000Public Benefit$80,000International$20,000Community Improvement$15,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JOBS FIRST COALITION INC: $505,000 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR SOUND TAX POLICY INC: $370,000 over 4y, 94% of budgetWisconsin Alliance for Reform Inc: $360,600 over 5y, 41% of budgetWMC ISSUES MOBILIZATION COUNCIL INC: $200,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetWISCONSIN PRINCIPLES INC: $142,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetSTATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetEMPLOY MILWAUKEE INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF METRO MILWAUKEE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWISCONSIN VALUES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SHEBOYGAN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget1848 PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JOBS FIRST COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR SOUND TAX POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds Wisconsin Alliance for Reform Inc ↗
  • Who funds WMC ISSUES MOBILIZATION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN PRINCIPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds STATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EMPLOY MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INNOVATIVE POLICY ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF METRO MILWAUKEE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WISCONSIN COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST GROWTH INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN VALUES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SHEBOYGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds 1848 PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wisconsin Insurance AllianceWI28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wisconsin Insurance Alliance · Wisconsin Beer Distributors Association Inc C/O the Kammer Gr · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Water Sports Industry Association Inc · Dairy Business Association Inc · Alliance of Health Insurers Ua · Wisconsin Homeowners Alliance Inc · Wmc Issues Mobilization Council Inc · Pharmaceutical Care Management Association · The American Council of Engineering Companies of Wisconsin Inc · Wisconsin Association of Health Plans Inc · The Jobs First Coalition Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wisconsin Bankers Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wisconsin Bankers Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wisconsin Bankers Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph