Skip to content

· Private foundation

Winnifred C Howard

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$176k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$681kHuman Services$341kArts & Culture$170kHousing & Shelter$170k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$22,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COVENANT HOUSE$22,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC$22,000
THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS$22,000
SPRINGPOINT FOUNDATION INC$22,000
UNICEF USA$22,000
THE PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA$22,000
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC$22,000
CARE USA INC$22,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $341k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS: $23k → 7%THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS: $22k → 7%THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS: $22k → 7%THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS: $22k → 7%THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS: $21k → 7%THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS: $21k → 7%THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS: $20k → 7%THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS: $20k → 7%COVENANT HOUSE: $23k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $22k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $22k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $22k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $21k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $21k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $20k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$1.4M
$0

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $170k · revenue +4%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $170k · revenue +77%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    8× · 2018–2025 · $170k · revenue +47%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    7/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $170,261 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $170,261 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFSave The Children Federation Inc: $170,261 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $170,261 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INCTHE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS: $170,261 · Human ServicesTHE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEASCOVENANT HOUSE: $170,261 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSEPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $170,261 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA O…SPRINGPOINT FOUNDATION INC: $170,261 · OtherSPRINGPOINT FO…
    International$681,044Human Services$340,522Arts & Culture$170,261Other$170,261

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS: $170,261 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $170,261 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $170,261 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $170,261 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $170,261 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $170,261 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $170,261 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE ESTAUGH TA MEDFORD LEAS ↗
    • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
    • Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
    • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
    • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Winnifred C Howard funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Winnifred C Howard. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
    • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
    • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Winnifred C Howard’s filings →

    More from the funding graph