Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Winner Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$281kPhilanthropy$118kHousing & Shelter$55kCommunity Improvement$55kEmployment$51kFood & Nutrition$48kHealth$40kCrime & Legal$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
$3,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN PA EASTERN OHIO$39,500
HOPE CENTER OF ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY INC$20,000
LIFT$15,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS - SHENANGO VALLEY$5,000
CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY$5,000
TEAM PENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATION$5,000
AWARE$5,000
WEST HILL MINISTRIES$3,500
SHARON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$3,000
YOUNGSTOWN BLUE COATS$3,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$3,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,500
TAILS OF HOPE$2,500
RANDOM ACTS OF ARTISTS$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUNGSTOWN BLUE COATS: $3k → 16%YOUNGSTOWN BLUE COATS: $3k → 16%YOUNGSTOWN BLUE COATS: $3k → 16%SHENANGO VALLEY URBAN LEAGUE: $500 → 13%SHENANGO VALLEY URBAN LEAGUE: $500 → 13%SHENANGO VALLEY URBAN LEAGUE: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$760k · 22 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
4

Total granted

$760k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+26%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TEAM PENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +16%
  • TO
    TAILS OF HOPE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +199%
  • KB
    KEYSTONE BLIND ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • TP
    TEAM PA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
3
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
4
Southeast Kansas Community Action P

Addressing the causes and effects of poverty by uniting staff, individuals, families, and community partners to provide quality, comprehensive services through compassionate, respectful relationships.

Community Improvement
5
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
6
Wayne County Action Program Inc

The specific mission of the organization is to coordinate resources to inspire and empower people to acheive their full potential.

Human Services
7
Montco Anti-Hunger Network

By leading coordinated action, montco anti-hunger network strengthens the food security safety net system in montgomery county, pa, working to end hunger in montgomery county.

Food & Nutrition
8
Central Susquehanna Opportunities Inc

Our mission - provide opportunities, empower people, and strengthen communities.

Employment
9
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

10
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
11
The National Association of State Workforce Agencies

The national association of state workforce agencies (naswa) mission is to enhance the state workforce agencies' ability to accomplish their goals, statutory roles and responsibilities.

12
American Youthworks

American youthworks (ayw) annually provides 400+ young adults with training and resources to build careers and strengthen their communities through education, paid career training, and national service. ayw programs prepare participants…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Food Warehouse of Mercer County and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN PA EASTERN OHIO — $381,142 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN PA EASTERN OHIOMEALS ON WHEELS - SHENANGO VALLEY — $35,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS - SHENANGO VALLEYAWARE INC — $28,000 · OtherLIFT — $25,000 · Other+14 more — $145,000 · Other+14 moreHOPE CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY INC — $50,600 · Arts & CultureCORNERSTONE YOUTH HOME — $45,000 · Housing & ShelterTEAM PENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Community ImprovementPENN NORTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $20,000 · Community ImprovementTAILS OF HOPE INC — $22,500 · AnimalsSHENANGO VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS — $10,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD WAREHOUSE OF MERCER COUNTY — $3,000 · Food & NutritionYOUNGSTOWN BLUE COATS — $8,500 · Human ServicesSHENANGO VALLEY URBAN LEAGUE — $1,500 · Human Services
Other$614,142Arts & Culture$50,600Housing & Shelter$45,000Community Improvement$45,000Animals$22,500Food & Nutrition$13,000Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOPE CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY INC — $50,600 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetCORNERSTONE YOUTH HOME — $45,000 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetAWARE INC — $28,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTEAM PENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTAILS OF HOPE INC — $22,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetKEYSTONE BLIND ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN BLUE COATS — $8,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD WAREHOUSE OF MERCER COUNTY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHENANGO VALLEY URBAN LEAGUE — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY INC
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE YOUTH HOME
  • Who funds AWARE INC
  • Who funds TEAM PENNSYLVANIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TAILS OF HOPE INC
  • Who funds PENN NORTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds SHENANGO VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS
  • Who funds KEYSTONE BLIND ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN BLUE COATS
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD WAREHOUSE OF MERCER COUNTY
  • Who funds SHENANGO VALLEY URBAN LEAGUE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern OhioPA28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio · Buhl Regional Health Foundation · Sha'Nini George Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Winner Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Winner Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Winner Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph