Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wings for Things Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$11MHealth$2.8MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.3MEducation$2.2MArts & Culture$1.6MHuman Services$1.4MInternational$1.3MMembership Benefit$600kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $750k
  • $250k+5 grants · $4.3M
$100,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,000,000
CT FOODSHARE$500,000
FEEDING AMERICA$250,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$250,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$250,000
ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA$200,000
REACH WESTERN CT$100,000
FAITH FOOD PANTRY$100,000
OPERATION HOMEFRONT$100,000
WE NEED DIVERSE BOOKS$100,000
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$50,000
THE ERIC CARLE MUSESUM OF PICTURE BOOK ART$50,000
BINC FOUNDATION$50,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS' RESEARCH HOSPITAL$25,000
CH BOOTH LIBRARY$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $1.0M → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
CT
MO
MD
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 26% of Wings for Things Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 22% of the giving stays in CT; read by stated purpose it is 12% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Wings for Things Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20M · 24 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
9

Total granted

$20M
$4.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+259%

Still filing today

42%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +77%
  • RW
    REACH Western CT Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +9% · 61% of their budget
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • NL
    NYU LANGONE - IMCG MELANOMA PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $2.0M
  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +361%
  • FF
    FAITH FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2017 · $400k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vermont Foodbank

To gather and share quality food and nurture partnerships so that no one in vermont will go hungry.

Food & Nutrition
2
Foodshare Inc

Foodshare is leading an informed, coordinated response to hunger as part of the overall community effort to alleviate poverty in hartford and tolland counties.

3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
6
Feeding Westchester Inc

Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.

7
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
8
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
9
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
10
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

11
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is We Need Diverse Books. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $4,500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNYU LANGONE - IMCG MELANOMA PROJECT — $2,000,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE - IMCG MELANOMA PROJECTCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $1,750,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESCT FOODSHARE — $1,450,000 · OtherCT FOODSHAREMSF USA (DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS) — $950,000 · OtherMSF USA (DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS)CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $950,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INCNYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER — $500,000 · OtherREACH NEWTON — $500,000 · Other+15 more — $1,900,000 · Other+15 moreFeeding America — $1,950,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding Amer…FAITH FOOD PANTRY — $400,000 · Food & NutritionFAITH FOOD P…FAITH FOOD PANTRY — $325,000 · Food & NutritionFAITH FOOD P…REACH Western CT Inc — $1,400,000 · EducationREACH Wes…WE NEED DIVERSE BOOKS — $550,000 · EducationWE NEED D…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $350,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,200,000 · InternationalACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA — $100,000 · InternationalOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $1,200,000 · Community ImprovementTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA — $600,000 · Membership Benefit
Other$14,500,000Food & Nutrition$2,675,000Education$1,950,000Human Services$1,350,000International$1,300,000Community Improvement$1,200,000Membership Benefit$600,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFeeding America — $1,950,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetREACH Western CT Inc — $1,400,000 over 7y, 61% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,200,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $1,200,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $950,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA — $600,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWE NEED DIVERSE BOOKS — $550,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $350,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH FOOD PANTRY — $325,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetTHE ERIC CARLE MUSEUM OF PICTURE BOOK ART INC — $300,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEWTOWN FOREST ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds REACH Western CT Inc
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA
  • Who funds WE NEED DIVERSE BOOKS
  • Who funds FAITH FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds FAITH FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds THE ERIC CARLE MUSEUM OF PICTURE BOOK ART INC
  • Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA
  • Who funds NEWTOWN FOREST ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wings for Things Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc5% of income from government
  • The Eric Carle Museum of Picture Book Art Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wings for Things Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Wings for Things Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph