Skip to content

· Private foundation

Windcrest Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$132kReligion$70kEducation$64kHuman Services$18kHealth$13kFood & Nutrition$7kAnimals$2k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $32k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$497k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMUELS PUBLIC LIBRARY$50,000
CALVARY EPISCOPAL CHURCH$32,000
MUSEUM OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY$5,000
FRONT ROYAL WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER$4,000
THE KENNEDY CENTER$3,000
LAUREL RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,500
WETA$2,500
ST LUKE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC$1,500
ARTS CHORALE OF WINCHESTER$1,000
VALLEY CHORALE OF FRONT ROYAL$600
MAIN STREET CHAMBER ORCHESTRA$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FRONT ROYAL WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 10%FRONT ROYAL WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 10%FRONT ROYAL WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 10%FRONT ROYAL WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$295k · 12 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$295k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+41%

Still filing today

42%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FRONT ROYAL WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +16%
  • SL
    ST LUKE COMMUNITY CLINIC INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +43%
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $7k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • WC
    WARREN COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COALITION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +52%
  • D
    DEMENTIAMATTERS
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +4%
  • WC
    Warren County Educational Endowment Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Humane Society
Animals
2
Warren Wildlife Gallery
Arts & Culture
3
Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers

Wayne Memorial Community Health Centers creates and sustains healthy rural communities by providing accessible, high quality medical, dental and behavioral health care for all, while recognizing and addressing other factors that influence…

Health
4
Williamsburg Community Health Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Warren-Vance Community Health Center Inc

The clinic provides primary healthcare in a spirit of compassion to limited income persons who are without adequate health insurance benefits in warren and vance counties, north carolina.

Health
6
Wyoming Valley Health & Education Foundation
—
7
Bowling Green Warren County Humane

We improve the lives of animals and people through advocacy, education and support. we envision a better world for all animals. our core values are compassion, care and respect for animals and people. we promote the human- animal bond.

Animals
8
Warren Senior Center

Community senior centerprovide meals to senior citizens & homebound citizens

Human Services
9
Front Royal - Warren County C-Cap

C-cap's mission is to provide "safety net" social services for the individuals and families of warren county who need temporary support as they seek to re-gain self-sufficiency and success in life and in work. c-cap works with and…

—
10
Greene Care Clinic

To provide free medical care to the working uninsured citizens in greene county, virginia.

Health
11
West Virginia Rural Health Association Inc

The west virginia rural health association (wvrha) advocates for empowering all west virginians to advance their quality of life, their well-being, and their access to excellence in rural health care. our mission is to unite people,…

Health
12
Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center

Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, & community service.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Front Royal Womens Resource Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dementiamatters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALVARY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $69,500 · OtherCALVARY EPISCOPAL CHURCHSAMUELS PUBLIC LIBRARY: $60,250 · OtherSAMUELS PUBLIC LIBRARYTHE KENNEDY CENTER: $50,500 · OtherTHE KENNEDY CENTER+6 more: $17,700 · Other+6 moreTHE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INC: $72,500 · Arts & CultureTHE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEU…GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE FRONT ROYAL WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesST LUKE COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $9,000 · HealthWARREN COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COALITION INC: $2,500 · HealthDEMENTIAMATTERS: $1,000 · HealthHUMANE SOCIETY OF WARREN COUNTY INC: $2,000 · AnimalsWarren County Educational Endowment Inc: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$197,950Arts & Culture$75,000Human Services$16,000Health$12,500Animals$2,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INC: $72,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FRONT ROYAL WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $16,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetST LUKE COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARREN COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COALITION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WARREN COUNTY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDEMENTIAMATTERS: $1,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWarren County Educational Endowment Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRONT ROYAL WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WARREN COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WARREN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds DEMENTIAMATTERS ↗
  • Who funds Warren County Educational Endowment Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of the Northern Shenandoah ValleyVA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Northern Shenandoah Valley · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Windcrest Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Windcrest Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Windcrest Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Windcrest Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Windcrest’s filings →

    More from the funding graph