Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wilmington Manor Lions Service Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$58k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202025.

Education$97kHuman Services$75kHealth$37kPhilanthropy$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$500Other$72k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$17,500
WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY$16,000
ALTRU VISION$5,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF DELAWARE$3,500
HEARTS FOR HUMANITY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,250
DELAWARE LIONS FOUNDATION$2,000
MELVIN JONES FOUNDATION$2,000
HOWARD J WESTON SENIOR CENTER$1,500
ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,500
BROWN SUGAR CATERING- DANA MOORE$1,180
GIRLS SCOUT TRP32$1,000
WILMINGTON MANOR FIRE CO$700
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$380
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $18k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $18k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $18k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $13k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$293k · 11 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$293k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+21%

Still filing today

55%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WU
    WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $97k · revenue +6%
  • LD
    LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +9%
  • ALTRUVISION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • SO
    SCOUTS OF BSA UNIT 27
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • T2
    TROOP 2281
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • WM
    WILMINGTON MANOR VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY INC — $97,000 · EducationWILMINGTON UNIVERSITY INCLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $75,000 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLINDSPECIAL OLYMPICS DELAWARE INC — $21,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS DELAWARE …ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $8,500 · OtherASBURY UNITED METHODIST CH…VICTORY CHURCH — $8,300 · OtherVICTORY CHURCHHOWARD J WESTON SENIOR CENTER — $8,000 · OtherHOWARD J WESTON SENIOR CEN…LIONS VISION RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $6,510 · OtherLIONS VISION RESEARCH FOUN…HEARTS FOR HUMANITY — $3,000 · OtherDEL MAR VA COUNCIL BSA — $3,000 · OtherSCOUTS OF BSA UNIT 27 — $2,500 · Other+13 more — $11,235 · Other+13 moreALTRUVISION — $37,104 · HealthALTRUVISIONDELAWARE LIONS FOUNDATION INC — $15,132 · PhilanthropyDELAWARE L…Lions Clubs International Foundation — $13,529 · PhilanthropyLions Club…WILMINGTON MANOR VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC — $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$97,000Human Services$75,000Other$72,045Health$37,104Philanthropy$28,661Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILMINGTON UNIVERSITY INC — $97,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $75,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALTRUVISION — $37,104 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS DELAWARE INC — $21,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDELAWARE LIONS FOUNDATION INC — $15,132 over 6y, 9.6% of budgetLions Clubs International Foundation — $13,529 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILMINGTON MANOR VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILMINGTON UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds ALTRUVISION
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS DELAWARE INC
  • Who funds DELAWARE LIONS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Lions Clubs International Foundation
  • Who funds WILMINGTON MANOR VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wilmington Manor Lions Service Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Special Olympics Delaware Inc3% of income from government
  • Wilmington University Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wilmington Manor Lions Service Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Wilmington Manor Lions Service Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph