Skip to content

· Public charity

Willow International Everfree

EverFree's mission is to end exploitation with better data, better care, and stronger collaboration.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$224kCrime & Legal$180kPhilanthropy$85kYouth Development$15k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $69,989, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,888,430 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,818,441 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
$15,070
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chab Dai International$21,495
Project Suma Inc$15,140
El Pozo de Vida$15,070
Orangewood$10,000
Dark Bali$8,284
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%El Pozo de Vida: $15k → 10%HUMANITY UNITED: $70k → 10%SAMARITANS PURSE: $102k → 21%Project Suma Inc: $15k → 13%Chab Dai International: $21k → 14%LIBERTAS COUNCIL INC: $170k → 6%Dark Bali: $8k → 10%SAMARITANS PURSE: $77k → 21%ORANGEWOOD: $15k → 10%Orangewood: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $1.8M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$1.4M · 81% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Program Services

East Asia and the Pacific$344k · 19% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Program Services

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Untrafficked Inc
Human Services
2
Mukti International

Mukti is a Sanskrit word that means "freedom from oppression and exploitation". Our goal is to see women and children find pathways to freedom. We partner with organizations around Asia that are on the frontlines helping to rescue and…

Crime & Legal
3
Sacred Link Global Humanitarian Project
—
4
Village Mission
Human Services
5
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
6
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
7
Free the Slaves

To end slavery and human trafficking around the world

International
8
Stichting Womens Initiatives for Gender Justice

Ending impunity for conflict related sexual violence

International
9
Human Rights and Business Award Foundation
Civil Rights
10
Mission 89 Inc

Fight human trafficking

—
11
International Society of Human Unity

The International Society of Human Unity's is a charitable and educational organization dedicated to promoting nonviolence, compassion, empowerment and raise awareness about human rights issues, such as human trafficking, through campaigns…

International
12
Global Voice
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Suma Inc; the most unlike its peers is Humanity United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIBERTAS COUNCIL INC: $170,000 · Crime & LegalLIBERTAS COUNCIL INCORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Crime & LegalORANGEWOOD FOUNDATIONSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $178,991 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEHumanity United: $70,000 · PhilanthropyHumanity UnitedEl Pozo de Vida: $15,070 · PhilanthropyEl Pozo de VidaCHAB DAI INTERNATIONAL: $21,495 · InternationalCHAB DAI I…Project Suma Inc: $15,140 · InternationalProject Su…Dark Bali: $8,284 · InternationalDark Bali
Crime & Legal$195,000Religion$178,991Philanthropy$85,070International$44,919

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $178,991 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumanity United: $70,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAB DAI INTERNATIONAL: $21,495 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetProject Suma Inc: $15,140 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetEl Pozo de Vida: $15,070 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetDark Bali: $8,284 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Willow International Everfree funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willow International Everfree. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Willow International Everfree’s filings →

    More from the funding graph