Skip to content

· Private foundation

William S & Ann Atherton Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$511k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$4.8MHealth$2.3MArts & Culture$2.3MPublic Benefit$969kCivil Rights$205kPhilanthropy$134kHuman Services$129kSocial Science$70kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $182k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
  • $250k+2 grants · $761k
$12,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLASSICALLY FORMED INC$510,500
FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION$250,000
OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS$150,000
NAT'L COWBOY & WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM$100,000
TURNING POINT USA$50,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$35,000
GODSPEED FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION TEAM INC$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES$20,000
JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY$12,500
INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE$12,000
CONSTITUTING AMERICA$12,000
STATE POLICY NETWORK$10,000
USA SHOOTING$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TULSA WARBIRD FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.0M · 60 repeat orgs$183k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

60 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
24

Total granted

$7.0M
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+27%

Still filing today

77%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureCivil RightsPublic BenefitAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +81%
  • CF
    CLASSICALLY FORMED INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue ×166 · 66% of their budget
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • FL
    FUNDAMENTAL LITERACY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -87%
  • 2C
    21 C AMERICA
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • OH
    One Hope Tulsa Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
5
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

—
10
International Republican Institute

Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.

Education
11
The Institute for Law and Strategy

This institute, unlike many institutions concerned with law and public affairs, will not devote itself to advocacy or lobbying, to litigation, or to holding large-scale public events. rather, it will focus on collaboration with established…

Civil Rights
12
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Frank Phillips Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/74
Grantees still filing
57/74
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,775,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGECLASSICALLY FORMED INC: $1,045,500 · EducationCLASSICALLY FORMED INCFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATIONOklahoma State University Foundation: $361,000 · EducationOklahoma State University Foundation+13 more: $538,000 · Education+13 moreNATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $2,050,000 · OtherNATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HER…+53 more: $1,078,425 · Other+53 moreMAYO CLINIC: $2,250,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute: $90,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $55,000 · Public Benefit+3 more: $27,500 · Public BenefitOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $390,500 · Public Safety & DisasterFRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $32,000 · Arts & CultureMOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE: $17,000 · Arts & CultureVICTIMS OF COMMUNISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $21,000 · Arts & CultureSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $70,000 · Civil RightsNRA CIVIL RIGHTS DEFENSE FUND: $10,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $6,000 · Civil RightsCITIZENS FOR SELF-GOVERNANCE: $5,000 · Civil RightsYOUNG AMERICANS AGAINST SOCIALISM: $5,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $500 · Civil Rights
Education$4,719,500Other$3,128,425Health$2,250,000Public Benefit$472,500Public Safety & Disaster$390,500Arts & Culture$235,000Civil Rights$96,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $2,250,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $2,050,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,775,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCLASSICALLY FORMED INC: $1,045,500 over 5y, 66% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $390,500 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $361,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $157,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC: $150,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetRiverfield Country Day School: $107,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetThe Frank Phillips Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $98,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLeadership Institute: $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $81,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $80,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $76,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $70,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $55,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $54,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetVALERIE'S HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $33,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $32,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $31,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH: $30,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCONSTITUTING AMERICA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa: $27,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGODSPEED FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION TEAM INC DBA LITESPEED FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION TEAM: $25,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetPHILOS HOSPITALITY INC: $22,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE: $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMercatus Center Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVICTIMS OF COMMUNISM MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOne Hope Tulsa Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC: $12,900 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetE FOUNDATION FOR OKLAHOMA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNRA CIVIL RIGHTS DEFENSE FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUSA Shooting Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN QUARTER HORSE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS: $8,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMACKINAC CENTER: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATUREWORKS INC: $7,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COWBOY AND WESTERN HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CLASSICALLY FORMED INC ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Riverfield Country Day School ↗
  • Who funds The Frank Phillips Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds VALERIE'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds CONSTITUTING AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds FUNDAMENTAL LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GODSPEED FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION TEAM INC DBA LITESPEED FLIGHT DEMONSTRATION TEAM ↗
  • Who funds PHILOS HOSPITALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Mercatus Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hardesty Family Foundation IncOK26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Arvest Foundation · The Robert S & Helen Grey Trippet Foundation Inc · John and Donnie Brock Foundation · Woodford Foundation · The Armstrong Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William S & Ann Atherton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William S & Ann Atherton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 170%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Valerie's House Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
17get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William S & Ann Atherton Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William S & Ann Atherton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William S & Ann Atherton’s filings →

More from the funding graph