Skip to content

· Private foundation

William Robert Baird Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$314k
Granted FY2026still arriving
16
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Human Services$878kYouth Development$531kPhilanthropy$391kFood & Nutrition$282kPublic Safety & Disaster$158kHousing & Shelter$126kHealth$124kRecreation & Sports$121k
02FY2026 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$14,907
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$33,609
THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION$31,741
LOVES' KITCHEN$30,501
WESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER$25,343
SALVATION ARMY$24,608
AMERICAN RED CROSS$19,158
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$14,907
MERIDIAN FREEDOM PROJECT$14,907
MISSISSIPPI SPECIAL OLYMPICS$14,906
HOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN$14,874
CHOCTAW AREA COUNCIL BSA$14,874
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EAST MISSISSIPPI$14,874
CARE LODGE$14,874
NEW DESTINY DAYCARE & LEARNING CENTER$14,873
THE FREE CLINIC OF MERIDIAN$14,873
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $271k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 23%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 23%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $34k → 23%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $33k → 23%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $31k → 23%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $29k → 23%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $27k → 23%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $26k → 23%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $25k → 23%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $24k → 23%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $21k → 23%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 66% of William Robert Baird Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in MS; by stated purpose, 61%.

William Robert Baird Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 15 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2026, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$2.3M
$5k

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    8× · 2019–2026 · $155k · revenue +69%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST MISSISSIPPI
    10× · 2017–2026 · $150k · revenue +75%
  • CL
    CARE LODGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $134k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CHOCTAW AREA COUNCIL #302
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Crisis Center Inc

To improve the quality of life in our community through crisis intervention and violence prevention.

Human Services
2
Gulf Coast Center for Nonviolence Inc

To provide food, shelter, medication, transportation, advocacy and counseling for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault, as well as for their family members.

—
3
Family Crisis Shelter Inc

To provide safe shelter, advocacy, counseling, referrals and support to all victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Civil Rights
4
Shelby County Children's Advocacy Center

Shelby County Children's Advocacy Center, Inc. is a non-profit organization that is dedicated to ending child abuse through education, advocacy, counseling, family support, and the pursuit of justice.

Crime & Legal
5
Children's Village Inc

Childrens Village was established as a refuge for dependent, destitute children in need of service and care

Human Services
6
Family Crisis Center

Promote safety, self-sufficiency, hope and healing to those effected by abuse.

Health
7
Beyond Violence Inc

Provide assistance to victims of domestic violence

Human Services
8
The Family Crisis Intervention Center of Region V Inc

The center's mission is to advocate and support social change that will result in non-violent relationships, homes and communities through public education, direct services, a haven and programs related to the issues of domestic and sexual…

—
9
Caring House Inc

To promote a violence free atmosphere from domestic and sexual violence in which survivors can recognize their options to have the opportunity to continue living violence free and regain their sense of self-worth; to educate and raise…

Human Services
10
Hope Crisis Center

Hope crisis center provides crisis line services and shelter to domestic violence and sexual assault victims

Health
11
Victory Center Ministries Inc

Victory Center Ministries is dedicated to providing services for families, men, and women with children in need. Most importantly, a caring and supportive environment is provided where lives are changed and individuals regain their…

Religion
12
The Glynn Community Crisis Center Inc

Providing emergency shelter and other services to persons battered and or abused, commonly referred to as domestic violence.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Care Lodge Domestic Violence Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Greater New Orleans Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $196,061 · OtherSALVATION ARMYAMERICAN RED CROSS: $157,679 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSWESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $155,118 · OtherWESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INCNEW DESTINY DAYCARE & LEARNING CENTER: $147,901 · OtherNEW DESTINY DAYCARE & LEARNING CENTERHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $125,933 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYMCCSA: $125,893 · OtherMCCSAMISSISSIPPI SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $120,633 · OtherMISSISSIPPI SPECIAL OLYMPICSMERIDIAN FREEDOM PROJECT: $120,254 · OtherMERIDIAN FREEDOM PROJECTCHOCTAW AREA COUNCIL BSA: $107,433 · OtherCHOCTAW AREA COUNCIL BSA+1 more: $4,938 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $271,291 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES INCCARE LODGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC: $134,344 · Human ServicesCARE LODGE DOMESTIC VI…HOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN INC: $120,992 · Human ServicesHOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILD…LAUDERDALE OUTREACH & VOL EFFORT: $281,812 · Food & NutritionLAUDERDALE O…THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION: $264,974 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST MISSISSIPPI: $150,441 · Youth DevelopmentFREE CLINIC OF MERIDIAN INC: $123,759 · Health
Other$1,261,843Human Services$526,627Food & Nutrition$281,812Philanthropy$264,974Youth Development$150,441Health$123,759

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAUDERDALE OUTREACH & VOL EFFORT: $281,812 over 10y, 18% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $271,291 over 10y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION: $264,974 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $155,118 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST MISSISSIPPI: $150,441 over 10y, 1.2% of budgetCARE LODGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC: $134,344 over 10y, 1.7% of budgetFREE CLINIC OF MERIDIAN INC: $123,759 over 10y, 2.3% of budgetHOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN INC: $120,992 over 10y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAUDERDALE OUTREACH & VOL EFFORT ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY HOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EAST MISSISSIPPI ↗
  • Who funds CARE LODGE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE CLINIC OF MERIDIAN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE VILLAGE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of East MississippiincMS17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of East Mississippiinc · The Paul and Sherry Broadhead Foundation · The Riley Foundation · Community Foundation of East Mississippi · Mississippi Food Network Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William Robert Baird Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William Robert Baird Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William Robert Baird’s filings →

    More from the funding graph