Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

William J McKee Jr Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$345k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$477kHealth$471kEducation$373kAnimals$318kFood & Nutrition$220kHuman Services$155kPhilanthropy$90kYouth Development$90kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE INC$100,000
WILLARD HOUSE AND CLOCK MUSEUM INC$50,000
WILLIAM J MCKEE JR CHARITABLE FOUNDATI$40,000
CLARK UNIVERSITY$40,000
BOOTHBAY RAILWAY VILLAGE MUSEUM$25,000
WORCESTER ACADEMY$20,000
YMCA OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS$20,000
WORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WORCESTER$10,000
UMASS CHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL$10,000
BARNSTABLE CLEAN WATER COALITION$5,000
CAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YWCA OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS: $5k → 11%YWCA OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS: $5k → 11%YWCA OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 24 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
22

Total granted

$2.1M
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+38%

Still filing today

63%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WILLARD HOUSE & CLOCK MUSEUM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $263k · revenue +305%
  • TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $233k · revenue +33%
  • WA
    WORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $225k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • SJ
    SAINT JOHN'S FOOD FOR THE POOR PROGRAM
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • NG
    NEW GARDEN PARK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +45%
  • UM
    UMASS MEMORIAL FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worcester Historical Museum

Worcester historical museum is a unique organization dedicated to collecting, preserving, and interpreting worcester's history in all time periods and subject areas.

Arts & Culture
2
Worcester Art Museum

To connect people, communities, and cultures through experience of art. collect the most significant works of art available in an effort to shape the quality/scope of the permanent collection while adhering to the institution's…

Arts & Culture
3
Worcester Business Development Corp

The worcester business development corporation (wbdc) is a private, non- profit business organization with a public purpose mission to serve as an innovation and leading force in the economic development of the city of worcester and the…

4
Worcester Country Club

The club is established for the purpose of providing athletic exercises including golf, bowling, swimming, tennis, cross country skiing, and other out-of-door sports, and for the establishment and maintenance of facilities for the…

5
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
6
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
7
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

9
Worcester County Horticultural Society

New england botanic garden at tower hill creates experiences with plants that inspire people and improve the world.

Environment
10
Metropolitan Waterworks Museum Inc

The mwm owns and operates the waterworks museum (the "museum"), including a community meeting room. the museum is a single condominium unit of the museum building condominium, one of separate condominium building regimes on the site. the…

Arts & Culture
11
Wachusett Greenways Inc

Wachusett greenways, inc. is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes to enhance awarenes of open space and greenways. the organization builds and maintains trails and offers trail events.

Environment
12
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Willard House & Clock Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent Schools and Edu…Family Philanthropic Founda…Youth Recreation and Develo…Community Arts CentersLand Conservation Organizat…Disability Services & Suppo…Cape Cod Coastal Conservati…Worcester Community Develop…Senior Residential CareAnimal Rescue and Shelter S…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr18%27%20–35yr14%31%35–55yr15%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr18%8%20–35yr14%37%35–55yr15%51%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
11%
954/8,317

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WILLARD HOUSE & CLOCK MUSEUM INC — $263,000 · OtherWILLARD HOUSE & CLOCK MUSEUM INCUMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE INC — $235,000 · OtherUMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE INCST JOHN'S FOOD FOR THE POOR PROGRA — $170,000 · OtherST JOHN'S FOOD FOR THE POOR PROGRAYMCA OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS — $140,000 · OtherYMCA OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTSBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WORCESTER INC — $80,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WORCESTER INCMASSACHUSETTS AUDOBON SOCIETY - WOR — $70,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS AUDOBON SOCIETY - WORSAINT JOHN'S FOOD FOR THE POOR PROGRAM — $50,000 · Other+25 more — $245,900 · Other+25 moreTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY — $233,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF CLAR…WORCESTER ACADEMY — $100,000 · EducationWORCESTER ACADEM…+1 more — $5,000 · EducationWORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC — $225,000 · AnimalsWORCESTER A…+1 more — $2,500 · AnimalsBOOTHBAY RAILWAY VILLAGE — $155,000 · Arts & CultureBOOTHBAY R…HERITAGE MUSEUMS AND GARDENS INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureHERITAGE M…WORCESTER NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureWORCESTER …+2 more — $1,700 · Arts & CultureCompassionate Care ALS Inc — $125,000 · Human ServicesYWCA CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesWILLIAM J MCKEE JR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $40,000 · PhilanthropyUMASS CHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER WORCESTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC — $46,000 · EnvironmentALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC — $15,000 · Environment
Other$1,253,900Education$338,000Animals$227,500Arts & Culture$216,700Human Services$140,000Philanthropy$85,000Environment$61,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILLARD HOUSE & CLOCK MUSEUM INC — $263,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY — $233,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC — $225,000 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetBOOTHBAY RAILWAY VILLAGE — $155,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetCompassionate Care ALS Inc — $125,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWORCESTER ACADEMY — $100,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WORCESTER INC — $80,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC — $46,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetHERITAGE MUSEUMS AND GARDENS INC — $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM J MCKEE JR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $33,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARTON CENTER FOR DIABETES EDUCATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWORCESTER NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYWCA CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNEW GARDEN PARK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER WORCESTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRIDE PRODUCTIONS INC — $7,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetTHE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUS Challenge Cup Inc — $3,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMcCarthys Wildlife Sanctuary Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCULTURAL CENTER OF CAPE COD — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL AID INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLARD HOUSE & CLOCK MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WORCESTER ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds BOOTHBAY RAILWAY VILLAGE
  • Who funds Compassionate Care ALS Inc
  • Who funds WORCESTER ACADEMY
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WORCESTER INC
  • Who funds THREE BAYS PRESERVATION INC
  • Who funds HERITAGE MUSEUMS AND GARDENS INC
  • Who funds WILLIAM J MCKEE JR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
  • Who funds THE BARTON CENTER FOR DIABETES EDUCATION
  • Who funds WORCESTER NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds YWCA CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds ALLIANCE TO PROTECT NANTUCKET SOUND INC
  • Who funds NEW GARDEN PARK INC
  • Who funds VETERANS INC
  • Who funds GREATER WORCESTER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PRIDE PRODUCTIONS INC
  • Who funds THE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds US Challenge Cup Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Fletcher FoundationMA28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Fletcher Foundation · Stoddard Charitable Trust · Bradley C Higgins Foundation · Ruth H & Warren a Ellsworth Foundation · Mildred H McEvoy Foundation · Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc · The Fred Harris Daniels Foundation · The George I Alden Trust · Wyman Gordon · Webster Five Foundation Inc · Schwartz Charitable Foundation · J Irving & Jane L England Charitable Trusta Molloy & F Russellco-Trustees

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization William J McKee Jr Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 130%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Veterans Inc58% of income from government
  • Three Bays Preservation Inc18% of income from government
  • New Garden Park Inc17% of income from government
  • Worcester Natural History Society Inc8% of income from government
  • Community Legal Aid Inc5% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University2% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Club of Worcester Inc2% of income from government
  • Greater Worcester Community Foundation Inc1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William J McKee Jr Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to William J McKee Jr Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph