Skip to content

· Private foundation

William J and Dora J Kalnoski Memorial

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$384kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
$5,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$929k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARYWOOD UNIVERSITY$15,500
PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY$13,500
KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY$8,500
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$5,500
SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY$4,500
MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY$2,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$2,000
SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY: $3k → 6%MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 9%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 10%KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY: $16k → 11%ALLBRIGHT COLLEGE: $6k → 11%LEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 11%LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $6k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14k → 12%MARYWOOD UNIVERSITY: $16k → 13%SEE ATTACHED: $43k → 14%LUZERNE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 15%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 16%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 22%CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART: $4k → 17%PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN: $6k → 9%SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 10%KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY: $11k → 11%ALLBRIGHT COLLEGE: $4k → 11%LEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 11%LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $4k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $11k → 12%MARYWOOD UNIVERSITY: $12k → 13%SEE ATTACHED: $43k → 14%LUZERNE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 15%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 16%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 22%KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY: $9k → 11%ALLBRIGHT COLLEGE: $4k → 11%LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $4k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $5k → 12%MARYWOOD UNIVERSITY: $11k → 13%BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 22%PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN: $4k → 9%KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY: $7k → 11%LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $4k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $3k → 12%MARYWOOD UNIVERSITY: $9k → 13%BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $3k → 12%KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $4k → 22%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $3k → 22%DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $3k → 22%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$297k · 17 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

$297k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+45%

Still filing today

53%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marywood University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $48k · revenue +9%
  • LV
    LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $18k · revenue +23%
  • TU
    Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
    3× · 2020–2022 · $13k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • WC
    WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • TJ
    THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +45%
  • UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD
    one grant, 2023 · $875 · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
7
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
8
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
9
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
12
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern New Hampshire University; the most unlike its peers is Thomas Jefferson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY: $48,950 · OtherKUTZTOWN UNIVERSITYPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $37,200 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGYPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $34,150 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYALLBRIGHT COLLEGE: $15,825 · OtherALLBRIGHT COLLEGELEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $11,450 · OtherLEHIGH CARBON COMMUNITY COLLEGEBLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY: $9,500 · OtherBLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITYLUZERNE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $8,200 · Other+3 more: $8,700 · OtherMarywood University: $47,775 · EducationMarywood UniversityLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $17,500 · EducationLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGETemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $12,600 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System o…DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $11,350 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYWILKES UNIVERSITY: $11,050 · EducationWILKES UNIVERSITYSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $9,875 · EducationSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITYPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN: $9,200 · EducationPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGNTHE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART: $5,200 · Education+4 more: $7,450 · Education+4 more
Other$173,975Education$132,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarywood University: $47,775 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $12,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $11,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILKES UNIVERSITY: $11,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $9,875 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN: $9,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART: $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS: $2,775 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern New Hampshire University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $875 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marywood University ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Southern New Hampshire University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William J and Dora J Kalnoski Memorial funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William J and Dora J Kalnoski Memorial. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William J and Dora J Kalnoski Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph