Skip to content

· Private foundation

William H and Velma C Gerber Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$100kHealth$77kPublic Safety & Disaster$48kArts & Culture$47kHuman Services$18kReligion$9kCommunity Improvement$5kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$627k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IDALIA AMBULANCE SERVICE INC$7,409
HOMESTEAD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$5,000
IDALIA FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,000
IDALIA VISIONS FOUNDATION$4,500
WRAY COMMUNITY DISTRICT HOSPITAL$3,091
IDALIA SCHOOL DISTRICT RJ-3$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Prairie Family Center: $4k → 11%Regional Home Visitation Program: $3k → 13%The Cubs Den: $1k → 13%Cub's Den: $700 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$235k · 17 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
25

Total granted

$235k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+15%

Still filing today

12%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    Idalia School District RJ3
    7× · 2017–2025 · $68k
  • HM
    HOMESTEAD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $47k
  • IA
    IDALIA AMBULANCE SERVICE INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $46k

Funded once

  • WC
    Wray Community Hospital Assn
    one grant, 2021 · $19k
  • GP
    GREAT PLAINS OF CHEYENNE COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +103%
  • PF
    Prairie Family Center
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Community College System Foundation

To support the mission of the colorado community college system by creating partnerships, developing resources, and advocating for the value of a community college education.

Education
2
Red Rocks Community College Foundation

The foundation's mission is to support red rocks community college in its commitment to students, learning and excellence. red rocks community college is committed to providing financial resources to students of all income levels to allow…

—
3
Arapahoe Community College Foundation Inc

The arapahoe community college foundation's mission is to support and promote the goals of arapahoe community college and its students by creating public awarness and funding resources that provide financial assistance and broad-based…

—
4
University of Colorado Foundation

The university of colorado foundation is the portal for philanthropic giving to the university of colorado and is responsible for receiving, managing, and investing the endowments and other gift funds the foundation holds for the benefit…

Education
5
Colorado State University Foundation

Colorado state university foundation receives, manages and invests gifts in support of csu.

Education
6
Western Colorado University Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to aid, directly or indirectly, western colorado university in fulfilling its educational purposes

—
7
Morgan Community College Foundation

The Foundation is dedicated to securing financial resources for hte growth and development of Morgan Community Collge and promoting a superior environment for learning.

Education
8
Big Bend Community College Foundation

To actively and visibly support the mission of the big bend community college.

Education
9
Cloud County Community College

To develop, improve, advance and support endeavors of cloud county community college.

Education
10
The Governors of the University of Calgary

The University is a board-governed public post-secondary institution operating in Alberta as a Comprehensive Academic and Research University (CARU) under the authority of the Post-secondary Learning Act (PSLA). CARU institutions have an…

—
11
Community College of Denver Fdn

The foundation's purpose is to develop a sustainable source of revenue to support community college of denver, its students, faculty, staff and programs.

Education
12
Colorado Christian University

Serving god by providing christ-centered higher education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Northern Colorado Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wray Area Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Idalia School District RJ3: $67,550 · OtherIdalia School District RJ3HOMESTEAD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $46,700 · OtherHOMESTEAD MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONIDALIA AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $45,909 · OtherIDALIA AMBULANCE SERVICE INCWray Community Hospital Assn: $18,705 · OtherWray Community Hospital AssnYuma County Fire Department: $15,000 · OtherIdalia Vounteer Fire Dept: $12,500 · Other+34 more: $82,636 · Other+34 morePrairie Family Center: $4,300 · Human ServicesRegional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs: $3,190 · Human ServicesTHE CUB'S DEN: $1,700 · Human ServicesGREAT PLAINS OF CHEYENNE COUNTY INC: $5,900 · HealthIDALIA VISION FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · Community Improvement
Other$289,000Human Services$9,190Health$5,900Community Improvement$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREAT PLAINS OF CHEYENNE COUNTY INC: $5,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIDALIA VISION FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetWRAY AREA FOUNDATION INC: $4,400 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetRegional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs: $3,190 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CUB'S DEN: $1,700 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS OF CHEYENNE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds IDALIA VISION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WRAY AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Prairie Family Center ↗
  • Who funds Regional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs ↗
  • Who funds THE CUB'S DEN ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kitzmiller-Bales TrustCO17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kitzmiller-Bales Trust · Kenneth and Ethel Powell Trust · El Pomar Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William H and Velma C Gerber Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William H and Velma C Gerber Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William H and Velma C Gerber Trust?

    Find your warmest path to William H and Velma C Gerber Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William H and Velma C Gerber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph