Skip to content

· Private foundation

William H & Ella W McMahan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$553kEducation$244kCivil Rights$121kPublic Benefit$119kHealth$58kHuman Services$24kCrime & Legal$18kInternational$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$804k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY$31,400
CRIEVE HALL CHURCH OF CHRIST$17,400
MT DORA CHILDREN'S HOME$10,000
FAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER$5,000
SYCAMORE VIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST$4,750
BRIDGE MINISTRY$3,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,000
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$1,000
THE THOMAS MORE SOCIETY$1,000
GLOBAL CHRISTIAN RELIEF$1,000
PRAGER U$1,000
NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICE DEFENSE$750
REVELATION MEDIA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TENNESSEE CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 10%HUMAN COALITION: $3k → 5%THE BLAKEFORD OF GREEN HILLS: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
SD
PA
CA
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$991k · 24 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
32

Total granted

$991k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+37%

Still filing today

54%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitCrime & LegalHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $167k · revenue +51%
  • TM
    THOMAS MORE SOCIETY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $57k · revenue +105%
  • LU
    LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $27k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • DT
    DINO TZANETOS ATHENS (GREECE) CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
  • SC
    SYCAMORE CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • SC
    SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
2
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
3
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc

As noted in its articles of incorporation, the mission of the aclu foundation is "to encourage, sponsor, and facilitate the cultivation and diffusion of knowledge and understanding of the various civil liberties and civil rights which are…

Civil Rights
4
American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation Inc

The aclu of north carolina dares to create a more perfect union - beyond one person, party, or side. our mission is to realize this promise of the united states and north carolina constitutions for all and expand the reach of their…

—
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
American Press Institute Inc

American press institute acts as a scout on the frontier of technology and audience behavior to identify where change is occurring and helps news organizations learn how to implement and scale that change successfully so they have a…

Arts & Culture
7
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
8
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
9
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
10
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
11
Freedom House

Freedom house is an independent non-partisan, non-governmental organization that works to defend and expand freedom globally to help secure a world where all are free. we identify and analyze threats to freedom (research & analysis),…

International
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Revelation Media Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/36
Grantees still filing
25/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRIEVE HALL CHURCH OF CHRIST: $383,850 · OtherCRIEVE HALL CHURCH OF CHRISTMY FAITH VOTES: $71,700 · OtherMY FAITH VOTESSYCAMORE VIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST: $63,500 · OtherSYCAMORE VIEW CHURCH OF CHRISTCHRISTIAN HOME AND BIBLE SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherBERRYS CHAPEL CHURCH OF CHRIST INC: $29,500 · OtherLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $26,650 · Other+34 more: $161,658 · Other+34 moreFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $166,760 · EducationFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVE…United American Patriots Inc: $25,700 · EducationUnited American Patr…+4 more: $20,000 · Education+4 moreTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $56,500 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICE DEFENSE INC: $13,150 · Crime & LegalTHE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY: $4,000 · Crime & LegalLeadership Institute: $40,000 · Public BenefitPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $5,000 · Public Benefit+3 more: $2,500 · Public BenefitAMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNION: $8,000 · Civil RightsFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $8,000 · Civil RightsCare Net: $5,500 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $4,500 · Civil RightsLIFE LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Civil RightsFAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $23,000 · HealthTENNESSEE CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE BLAKEFORD AT GREEN HILLS: $3,780 · Human ServicesHUMAN COALITION: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$766,858Education$212,460Crime & Legal$73,650Public Benefit$47,500Civil Rights$27,500Health$23,000Human Services$11,280

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY: $166,760 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $56,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLeadership Institute: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $26,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnited American Patriots Inc: $25,700 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICE DEFENSE INC: $13,150 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC: $10,545 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $8,650 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCare Net: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTENNESSEE CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BLAKEFORD AT GREEN HILLS: $3,780 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF COMPASSION: $3,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetUnited States Justice Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN COALITION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPKD Foundation: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN IMMIGRATION CONTROL FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREVELATION MEDIA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds United American Patriots Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICE DEFENSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNION ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CORNERSTONE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Care Net ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY ↗
  • Who funds THE BLAKEFORD AT GREEN HILLS ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF COMPASSION ↗
  • Who funds United States Justice Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS19.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Ebs Foundation · Farrell Family Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Christian Heritage Foundation Attn Michael a Kulp · Irving Rothlein Foundation · H & R Peters Family Foundation · John P & Kathryn G Evans Foundation · Quaker City Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William H & Ella W McMahan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William H & Ella W McMahan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William H & Ella W McMahan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to William H & Ella W McMahan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William H & Ella W McMahan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph