· Private foundation
The Susan and William Yarmuth Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of THE SUSAN AND WILLIAM YARMUTH FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $229k
- $250k+1 grant · $674k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC | $674,179 |
| UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC | $125,000 |
| GILDA'S CLUB | $104,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $328k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TLTHE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC6× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +179%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC3× · 2021–2024 · $438k · revenue +13%
- GCGILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC4× · 2018–2024 · $354k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF LOUSIVILLEone grant, 2023 · $338k
- KCKBY Congregations Together Incone grant, 2023 · $135k · revenue -5%
- TTTHE TEMPLE CONGREGATION ADATH ISREAL B RITH SHOLOM INCone grant, 2017 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jhf is a grant making organization with a mission to support the jewish heritage mitzvah fund and to support the medical and general community of kentucky (excluding boone, kenton and campbell counties) and floyd, clark, harrison and scott…
The louisville preservation fund,inc. revitalizes historic places through direct real estate action and partnerships to enhance community and promote economic development.
Actors theatre unlocks human potential, builds community and enriches quality of life by engaging people in theatre that reflects the wonder and complexity of our time.
At kentucky blood center, our mission is to ensure a safe and abundant supply of lifegiving blood to the hospitals we serve. we are here to support our local communities in any way that we are able by being an integral and valued partner…
The Louisville Water Foundation's mission is to improve the health and well-being of the communities we serve and around the world by providing water assistance and water education. The Foundation will provide assistance for water…
Lpm provides independent and courageous news, music and experiences that serve the needs and aspirations of our diverse communities.
To work in concert with the louisville bar association, to promote the legal profession and the study of law through continuing education for lawyers and improve the community through the provision of law-related benefits, including pro…
The mission of the Cardiovascular Innovation Institute is to improve lives through world-class cardiovascular research, scientific discovery and new enterprise creation.
To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.
The purpose of Hillel is to be a center for enriching the lives of Jewish students in the Greater Cincinnati area and to strengthen Jewish identity through social and a broad range of programs and services in an atmosphere that is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community of Louisville Inc and the most unlike its peers is Compassion & Cooking. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE LOUISVILLE ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds KBY Congregations Together Inc ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION & COOKING ↗
- Who funds DANCERS WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTRAL FLORIDA HILLEL INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds PAYNE HOLLOW ON THE OHIO ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE CEO COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sheldon & Denise Schiller Foundation Inc · Charles L Weisberg Family Foundation · Julia & Isadore Klein Family Foundation Inc · Kindred Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · Jewish Heritage Fund for Excellence Inc · W L Lyons Brown Foundation · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Isadore & Rose Goldstein Family Foundation Inc · Roth Family Foundation Inc F/K/A Louis T Roth Foundation Inc · The Lewis and Gladys Bass Family Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Susan and William Yarmuth Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.