Skip to content

· Private foundation

William & Alfred Taft Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$101kFood & Nutrition$89kHuman Services$55kYouth Development$33kPublic Benefit$20kHealth$16kCommunity Improvement$2k
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$932k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OXFORD COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
OXFORD COUNCIL ON AGING$10,000
OXFORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY$7,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST$4,000
EMMANUEL COLLEGE$2,000
BENTLEY UNIVERSITY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BRIDGEWATER STATE COLLEGE: $2k → 8%MERRIMACK COLLEGE: $2k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST: $4k → 12%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%POINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $2k → 11%EASTERN CT STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%NC STATE UNIVERSITY - RALEIGH: $2k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $2k → 25%BENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%ENDICOTT COLLEGE: $2k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF: $11k → 11%UMASS AMHERST: $2k → 12%EMMANUEL COLLEGE: $2k → 16%ENDICOTT COLLEGE: $2k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF: $11k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $2k → 12%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF: $11k → 11%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF: $11k → 11%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF: $11k → 11%YOU INC: $8k → 11%YOU INC: $8k → 11%TOWN OF OXFORD: $20k → 11%OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL: $20k → 11%OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL: $14k → 11%OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL: $14k → 11%OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL: $12k → 11%OXFORD COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 11%OXFORD COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 11%OXFORD COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 11%OXFORD COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 11%OXFORD COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 11%OXFORD COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 11%OXFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10k → 11%OXFORD COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 11%OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL: $8k → 11%OXFORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $7k → 11%OXFORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $7k → 11%OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL: $6k → 11%OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL: $6k → 11%OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL: $5k → 11%OXFORD COUNCIL ON AGING: $5k → 11%OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL: $3k → 11%COLLEGE OF THE HOLY: $2k → 11%CLARK UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%CLARK UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
PA
CT
KY
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of William & Alfred Taft Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in RI; by stated purpose, 65%.

William & Alfred Taft Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 32% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$277k · 13 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2026, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$277k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+13%

Still filing today

38%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    THE OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $89k · revenue +14% · 30% of their budget
  • ENDICOTT COLLEGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +7%
  • TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TO
    TOWN OF OXFORD
    one grant, 2025 · $20k
  • OP
    OXFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2025 · $4k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
9
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
10
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University; the most unlike its peers is The Oxford Ecumenical Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL INC: $88,754 · OtherTHE OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL INCGIRLS INCORPORATED OF: $55,000 · OtherGIRLS INCORPORATED OFOXFORD COMMUNITY CENTER: $40,000 · OtherOXFORD COMMUNITY CENTEROXFORD COUNCIL ON AGING: $35,000 · OtherOXFORD COUNCIL ON AGINGTOWN OF OXFORD: $20,000 · OtherTOWN OF OXFORDOXFORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $17,500 · OtherOXFORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARYYOU INC: $16,000 · Other+18 more: $50,000 · Other+18 moreENDICOTT COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationENDICOTT …TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · EducationTRUSTEES …NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationNORTHEAST…ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationASSUMPTIO…BENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationBENTLEY U…Nova Southeastern University Inc: $2,000 · EducationNova Sout…EMMANUEL COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationEMMANUEL …UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $2,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…MERRIMACK COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationMERRIMACK…Rochester Institute of Technology: $1,500 · EducationRochester…BABSON COLLEGE: $1,500 · EducationBABSON CO…SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationSUFFOLK U…
Other$322,254Education$28,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL INC: $88,754 over 9y, 30% of budgetENDICOTT COLLEGE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERRIMACK COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBABSON COLLEGE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUFFOLK UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE OXFORD ECUMENICAL COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ENDICOTT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds POINT PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BENTLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
  • Who funds EMMANUEL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds MERRIMACK COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BABSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William & Alfred Taft Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William & Alfred Taft Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute: 8% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Babson College: 3% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Endicott College: 1% of income from government
  • Merrimack College: 1% of income from government
  • Suffolk University: 1% of income from government
  • Assumption University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to William & Alfred Taft Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to William & Alfred Taft Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on William & Alfred Taft’s filings →

More from the funding graph