Skip to content
Willard Thomas and Margaret Rose Plogsterth at a glance

· Private foundation

Willard Thomas and Margaret Rose Plogsterth

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$53kReligion$41kCivil Rights$34kHealth$32kFood & Nutrition$31kAnimals$25kArts & Culture$2k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$875k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY ENGLISH LUTHERAN CHURCH$6,000
MATTHEW 25 INC$6,000
COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK$6,000
YWCA SHELTER FOR WOMEN$6,000
FORT WAYNE CHILDREN'S ZOO$6,000
CENTER FOR NONVIOLENCE INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HEADWATERS COUNSELING: $6k → 12%HEADWATERS COUNSELING: $6k → 12%HEADWATERS COUNSELING: $6k → 12%Headwaters Counseling: $6k → 12%HEADWATERS COUNSELING: $4k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$208k · 7 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$208k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+161%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR NONVIOLENCE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +1%
  • M2
    MATTHEW 25 INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +96%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • YW
    Young Womens Christian Association
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • JC
    John C Campbell Folk School Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +161%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY ENGLISH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $35,100 · OtherTRINITY ENGLISH LUTHERAN CHURCHYWCA SHELTER FOR WOMEN: $26,600 · OtherYWCA SHELTER FOR WOMENYoung Womens Christian Association: $5,500 · OtherYoung Womens Christian AssociationCENTER FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $33,100 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR NONVIO…+1 more: $1,000 · Crime & LegalMATTHEW 25 INC: $32,100 · HealthMATTHEW 25 INCCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $30,600 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY HARVES…FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC D/B/A HEADWATERS COUNSELING: $26,100 · Human ServicesFAMILY & CHIL…FORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $24,600 · AnimalsFORT WAYNE Z…John C Campbell Folk School Inc: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$67,200Crime & Legal$34,100Health$32,100Food & Nutrition$30,600Human Services$26,100Animals$24,600Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR NONVIOLENCE INC: $33,100 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMATTHEW 25 INC: $32,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $30,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC D/B/A HEADWATERS COUNSELING: $26,100 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $24,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJohn C Campbell Folk School Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR NONVIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEW 25 INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC D/B/A HEADWATERS COUNSELING ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds John C Campbell Folk School Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Willard Thomas and Margaret Rose Plogsterth funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Willard Thomas and Margaret Rose Plogsterth. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Willard Thomas and Margaret Rose Plogsterth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home