Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wilbert & Genevieve Schauer Foundatation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$181k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$128k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$303kArts & Culture$97kReligion$53kHealth$28kHuman Services$28kCivil Rights$25kHousing & Shelter$24kPhilanthropy$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k31 grants · $53k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $128k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$894k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARCUS SCHOOL$127,500
ELMBROOK EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$7,000
UW FOUNDATION$6,000
ST CAMILLUS FOUNDATION$5,600
AMERICAN ASSOC OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
KUBLY FOUNDATION$3,000
FLORENTINE OPERA$2,500
HEAR WISCONSIN$1,500
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$1,500
SALVATION ARMY$1,500
CURATIVE CARE NETWORK$1,500
MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,200
MILWAUKEE REPERATORY THEATER$1,200
WILSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $150 → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITY: $750 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITY: $600 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%BETHESDA LUTHERAN COMMUNITY: $600 → 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%WOMEN'S CENTER: $500 → 5%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%WOMEN'S CENTER: $100 → 5%WOMANS CENTER: $100 → 5%LIFES CONNECTION: $100 → 5%SAN CAMILLO: $300 → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $2k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $2k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $1k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $950 → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $500 → 17%ST CATHERINE RESIDENCE: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
DE
AR
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$614k · 68 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
61

Total granted

$614k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+34%

Still filing today

51%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +39%
  • FLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +38%
  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • GL
    GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TR
    TEAM RUBICON INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +18%
  • LH
    LUTHERAN HOME FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -1671%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
3
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
4
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
5
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
6
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
7
Wisconsin Medical Credit Union

Wisconsin medical cu is a not for profit, member owned organization dedicated to meet the members needs by providing sound financial services including competitive rates, information and services while maintaining financial stability of…

—
8
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
9
Wisconsin Association of Health Plans Inc

Promote a positive state legislative and regulatory climate for wisconsin's community health plans. the association communicates with regulatory agencies to promote issue positions representing community health plans.

—
10
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
11
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
12
Reedsburg Area Medical Center

Reedsburg area medical center, always there, going beyond the expected to provide compassionate, quality, and efficient health care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/62
Grantees still filing
49/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $255,000 · OtherST MARCUS LUTHERAN CHURCHST MARCUS MINISTRIES: $22,000 · OtherST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC CHURCH: $15,700 · Other+88 more: $164,029 · Other+88 moreFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC: $30,200 · Arts & CultureFLORENTINE OPE…MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $14,400 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE REPE…MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBL…MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $7,800 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART …MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,650 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMP…UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $3,600 · Arts & CultureSunset Playhouse Inc: $3,100 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $3,075 · Arts & CultureSHARON LYNNE WILSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $3,100 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $34,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY…AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $25,070 · EducationAMERICAN A…+1 more: $100 · EducationHEAR Wisconsin Inc: $5,450 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesABLELIGHT INC: $1,950 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $700 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $600 · Human Services+4 more: $650 · Human ServicesCURATIVE CARE NETWORK INC: $9,500 · HealthKathy's House Inc: $2,100 · HealthTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC: $1,642 · Health+5 more: $850 · HealthMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterLUTHERAN HOME FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterSt Bakhita Catholic Worker Inc: $500 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $100 · Housing & ShelterCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,750 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,200 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,250 · International
Other$456,729Arts & Culture$81,925Education$59,670Human Services$14,350Health$14,092Housing & Shelter$9,100International$8,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $34,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC: $30,200 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $25,070 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $14,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $13,350 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetElmbrook Education Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCURATIVE CARE NETWORK INC: $9,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $7,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetORDER OF ST CAMILLUS FOUNDATION INC: $6,065 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $5,650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEAR Wisconsin Inc: $5,450 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $3,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSunset Playhouse Inc: $3,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $3,075 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSHARON LYNNE WILSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $2,695 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKathy's House Inc: $2,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABLELIGHT INC: $1,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHARLES E KUBLY FOUNDATION INC: $1,642 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHER ACADEMY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE DOMES ALLIANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Bakhita Catholic Worker Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD PANTRY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN CAMILLO INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON READING PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN PHILATELIC SOCIETY: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NAPLES PLAYERS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Battlefield Trust: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR RIGHTS OF CITIZENS WITH HANDICAPS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREDgen Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds Elmbrook Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CURATIVE CARE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ORDER OF ST CAMILLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAR Wisconsin Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Sunset Playhouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARON LYNNE WILSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN HOME FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Kathy's House Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI48.4× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Youth Foundation Inc · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wilbert & Genevieve Schauer Foundatation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wilbert & Genevieve Schauer Foundatation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 133 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wilbert & Genevieve Schauer Foundatation’s filings →

More from the funding graph