Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Who (Women Helping Others) Inc

To support organizations dedicted to women, children and families in need and to encourage women everywhere to help others through volunteer service.

$245k
Granted FY2017
10
Grants FY2017
9
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$29,400
Median grant
9
States reached
$123k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WINGS OF LIFE INC$40,000
PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$40,000
THE DREAM CENTER OF JACKSON$30,000
THE JAKE KOENIGSDORF FOUNDATION$30,000
NEW OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL FOR WOMEN$29,400
LYNCHURG BEACON OF HOPE$20,500
CHRISTIAN WOMEN'S JOB CORP OF KERR$20,000
CENTRAL FLORIDA PREGNANCY CENTER INC$13,353
THE MENDED HEARTS INC$12,000
BONNEY LAKE-LAKE TAPPS SENIOR CITIZENS$10,048
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTRAL FLORIDA PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $13k → 12%THE DREAM CENTER OF JACKSON: $30k → 15%NEW OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL FOR WOMEN: $29k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
KY
VA
AZ
TN
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hope Center Inc

To save lives and strengthen families through sexual risk-avoidance programs, unplanned pregnancy support and after abortion care. free services include pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, parenting classes, material support, adoption education,…

Human Services
2
Choices for Women Resource Center Inc

Choices life resource center exists to glorify god by saving babies and empowering families to share in the abundant life god has offered to all his creation. we do this by providing educational opportunities, giving practical support, and…

Human Services
3
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
4
Dream Centers of Colorado Springs

Dream centers serves vulnerable women and children who have nowhere else to turn. dream centers programs help those trapped in cycles of poverty to find hope, empbrace health, and build sustainable lives for themselves and their children.

Health
5
Hope Life Center

A christ centered organization dedicated to erasing abortion from illinois one woman and one child at a time.

Health
6
Circle of Freedom

Our mission is leading women struggling with life-controlling addictions to freedom in jesus and helping them reestablish their lives. we provide guidance, discipleship & direction with life reestablishment through jail ministry, mentoring…

Crime & Legal
7
A Better Choice Women's Center Inc

Abc women's center is a christ centered ministry offering hope, help and healing to men and women facing an unplanned pregnancy by providing a full- range of life affirming options and support. the center offers free and confidential…

8
Life Choices Medical Center

Christian organization offering a hopeful future by empowering women and men to make life-affirming decisions

Human Services
9
Hope Resource Center

Hope resource center, a life-affirming medical clinic, demonstrates the love of christ by providing educational resources and medical services to women and men facing an unplanned pregnancy or sexual health concern in knoxville and…

Health
10
New Life Pregnancy Center

New life pregnancy center is a christ-centered ministry committed to upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of christ to those facing unplanned pregnancies through the provision of spiritual, physical, and emotional…

Health
11
The Hope Center Inc

The mission for the hope center is to equip pregnant women to choose life. our vision is that every life is valued and families thrive in the love of chirst. the hope center programs incude options medical clinic, which specializes in…

12
Vision of Hope Ministries Inc

Recognize the worth and sanctity of human life by ministering to young women, children, and families in a christ-centered environment. offer a faith-based residential treatment program for girls age 14-28 struggling with: unplanned…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mended Hearts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Dream Center — $30,000 · Human ServicesThe Dream CenterNEW OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL FOR WOMEN INC — $29,400 · Human ServicesNEW OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL FOR WOMEN …CENTRAL FLORIDA PREGNANCY CENTER — $13,353 · Human ServicesCENTRAL FLORIDA PREGNANCY CENTERPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation — $40,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital Foun…JAKE KOENIGSDORF FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · HealthJAKE KOENIGSDORF FOUNDATION INCWINGS OF LIFE INC — $40,000 · OtherWINGS OF LIFE INCTHE MENDED HEARTS INC — $12,000 · OtherTHE MENDED HEARTS INCBONNEY LAKE-LAKE TAPPS AREA SENIOR CITIZENS — $10,048 · OtherBONNEY LAKE-LAKE TAPPS AREA …LYNCHBURG BEACON OF HOPE INC — $20,500 · EducationLYNCHBURG…CHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORPS OF KERR COUNTY — $20,000 · EmploymentCHRISTIAN…
Human Services$72,753Health$70,000Other$62,048Education$20,500Employment$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJAKE KOENIGSDORF FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetThe Dream Center — $30,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetNEW OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL FOR WOMEN INC — $29,400 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetLYNCHBURG BEACON OF HOPE INC — $20,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORPS OF KERR COUNTY — $20,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetTHE MENDED HEARTS INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Who (Women Helping Others) Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Who (Women Helping Others) Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Who (Women Helping Others) Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph