Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Whitmore Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
12
Organizations funded FY2024
8%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$7,500
Organizations funded a year
10 to 14
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$1.1M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 8% of the organizations Whitmore Charitable Trust funded were first-time grantees, receiving 8% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving11$51k18%
FY202412$64k8%
FY202310$66k50%
FY202213$66k8%
FY202112$63k33%
FY201914$59kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$279kHealth$42kCommunity Improvement$21kEducation$20kYouth Development$4kEnvironment$3k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 20 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($50k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Whitmore Charitable Trust supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOmaha Community Playhouse: $45,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBlue Barn Theatre: $37,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetOmaha Theater Company: $35,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetOmaha Conservatory of Music: $23,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOpera Omaha Inc: $21,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPartners for Livable Omaha: $21,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetChildren's Hospital & Medical Center Foundation: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJoslyn Castle Trust Inc: $16,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetThe Durham Museum: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJoslyn Art Museum: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMetropolitan Community College Foundation: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKindair at the Benson Theatre: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNebraska Brass Inc: $10,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetOmaha Area Youth Orchestras: $9,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetWhyarts Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOmaha Performing Arts Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Union for Contemporary Art Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital & Medical Center: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of the Midlands: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE34.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · The Holland Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Nac Development Corporation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Paul and Oscar Giger Foundation Inc · The Fred and Eve Simon Charitable Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Whitmore Charitable Trust with peer funders

About Whitmore Charitable Trust

How much does Whitmore Charitable Trust give?
Whitmore Charitable Trust reported 11 grants totaling $50,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 14 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does Whitmore Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (76%), Health (11%), Community Improvement (6%).
Who are Whitmore Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Omaha Community Playhouse ($45k), Blue Barn Theatre ($37k), Omaha Theater Company ($35k).
Does Whitmore Charitable Trust fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Whitmore Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Whitmore Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Sherwood Foundation, Peter Kiewit Foundation, Weitz Family Foundation.
Where is Whitmore Charitable Trust based?
Whitmore Charitable Trust is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Whitmore’s filings →

More from the funding graph