· Private foundation
White T & M Memorial Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WILLIAM AND CARRIE GOTTSCHE FNDTN | $19,000 |
| CASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $14,250 |
| SAINT JOSEPHS CHILDRENS HOME | $9,500 |
| BLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND | $9,500 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC | $9,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $9,500 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $9,500 |
| ARC OF NATRONA COUNTY | $4,750 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF MONTANA AND WYOMING | $4,750 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $4,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +96%
- SJST JOSEPH'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC9× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +24%
- BEBLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND8× · 2018–2025 · $76k · revenue +462%
Funded once
- NCNATRONA COUNTY BLUE ENVELOPE FUNDone grant, 2017 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
To reduce the impact of cancer on wyoming residents diagnosed with cancer by providing non-medical, charitable financial assistance and by providing free education and screening opportunities to residents not diagnosed with cancer.
To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.
To improve and enhance rural health services and promote healthier individuals and communities in wyoming.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To maintain a high quality patient care delivery system that provides access to comprehensive health care services, regardless of ability to pay. it is the desire of chccw to treat all patients with the dignity and respect they deserve…
To help rural providers with collaborative solutions and resources focusing on rural healthcare.
We are committed to advancing the health and wellness of the individuals and communities we are honored to serve.
Southwestern vermont health care exists to provide exceptional health care and comfort to the people we serve. see schedule o for additional details.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Joseph's Children's Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blue Envelope Health Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WILLIAM H AND CARRIE GOTTSCHE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE ENVELOPE HEALTH FUND ↗
- Who funds Arc of Natrona County ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF MONTANA AND WYOMING ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization White T & M Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.