How much did WHIRLPOOL COLLECTIVE IMPACT FUND grant in FY2021?

WHIRLPOOL COLLECTIVE IMPACT FUND reported 15 grants totaling $150,000 in its FY2021 IRS filing.

Where is WHIRLPOOL COLLECTIVE IMPACT FUND based?

WHIRLPOOL COLLECTIVE IMPACT FUND is based in MI.

WHIRLPOOL COLLECTIVE IMPACT FUND

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

WHIRLPOOL COLLECTIVE IMPACT FUND

The WHIRLPOOL COLLECTIVE IMPACT FUND will host events, raising funds to further our collective impact strategy.

$150k

Granted FY2021

Grants

Communities

$10k

Largest

01What you fund

0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2021.

Youth Development$4.6MPhilanthropy$1.8MRecreation & Sports$750kEducation$356kHuman Services$40kOther$285k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

connect powerpower carecare causescauses strengthenyoung

2019

care countscounts laundrystudent specialyoung

2020

student specialcare countscounts laundryyoung

2021

care countscounts laundry

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2021 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

Oliver Elementary$10,000
Henry Lord Community School$10,000
Community Day Arlington Elementary School$10,000
EL Haynes Public Charter School$10,000
South Floyd Elementary School$10,000
Citizens Academy Southeast$10,000
Arlington Elementary$10,000
Reyes Maria Ruiz Leadership Academy$10,000
KIPP Delta Public Schools$10,000
Meridian Public Charter School$10,000
Mastery Charter School-Harrity Elementary$10,000
Wellington Elementary$10,000
Clarksdale Collegiate Public Charter School$10,000
Avondale Elementary$10,000
Delaware Valley Fairness Project$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 12%. 50% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$7.4M · 13 repeat orgs$451k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2021, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$7.4M

$351k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%

+39%

Still filing today

69%

71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BG
Boys & Girls Club of Benton Harbor
4× · 2017–2020 · $4.6M · revenue +152% · 64% of their budget
SJ
ST JOSEPH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
4× · 2017–2020 · $1.8M · revenue +94%
UP
Uplift Pinnacle Primary
2× · 2019–2020 · $40k · revenue +63%

Funded once

BE
BROOKVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
one grant, 2017 · $30k
GS
Girl Scouts of Michiana
one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue 0%
KW
KIPP WAYS ACADEMYgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +150%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Leadership Public Schools

To operate public charter schools in california.

Education

Lead Charter Schools

Educate students by operating an arizona charter school.

Education

Apalachicola Bay Charter School

It is the mission of the apalachicola bay charter school that each student will reach his or her academic and social potential.

Education

Chicago Education Partnership

To create a school that dramatically transforms the lives of k-8 students and prepares them for success in college and in life through: the delivery of a rigorous and personalized academic program, a focus on holistic education, and the…

Education

The New American Academy Charter School

The new american academy charter school empowers learners and inspires leaders to make this a better world. through our collaborative teacher teams, mastery-based career ladder, and looping cycles, we offer personalized rigorous…

Education

Global Scholars Academy (Gsa)

Operation of a public charter school.

Education

Elite Public Schools

The organization's mission is to ensure all students reach their fullest potential through access to learning spaces that honor and celebrate students' rich cultural heritage and challenge them with rigorous and relevant learning…

Education

Los Angeles College Prep Academy

Public charter school offering college preparatory education to students in northeast l.a.

Education

Accelerated Elementary and Secondary Schools

Operation of a private school

Education

Dc Preparatory Academy

Dc prep is a network of public charter schools serving pk3-8th grade students in washington, dc.

Education

Ace Charter School

To operate public charter schools and provide educational programs.

Education

Lake Norman Charter School

Lake norman charter school prepares students to be community leaders demonstrating personal integrity with a life-long desire to learn, lead and serve.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Futuro Academy Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Delaware Valley Fairness Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

4%2/53

the rest of the field

10%

5,620/53,803

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

35/38

Grantees still filing

27/38

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Youth Development$4,625,000Philanthropy$1,820,000Recreation & Sports$750,000Education$356,478Other$285,000Human Services$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Good Sports IncMA33.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Good Sports Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · For Inspiration and Recognition of · Project Lead the Way Inc · Charter Fund Inc · The Broad Center · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · Digital Promise Global · Project Lead the Way Inc · Share Our Strength · The George W Bush Foundation · Gates Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WHIRLPOOL COLLECTIVE IMPACT FUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Boys & Girls Club of Benton Harbor.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~14 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 383461586 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Boys & Girls Club of Benton Harbor, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 14 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 64% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Whirlpool Collective Impact Fund?

Find your warmest path to Whirlpool Collective Impact Fund through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WHIRLPOOL COLLECTIVE IMPACT FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Whirlpool Collective Impact Fund?

More from the funding graph

WHIRLPOOL COLLECTIVE IMPACT FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Whirlpool Collective Impact Fund?

More from the funding graph