Skip to content

· Public charity

Westminster Retirement Communities Foundation Inc

Westminster retirement communities foundation, inc.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9.8M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$53MHousing & Shelter$9k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $554k
  • $250k+2 grants · $10M
$77,346
Median grant
1
States reached
$115M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES$9,787,623
WESLEY MANOR INC$427,890
WESTMINSTER SHORES INC$200,189
RIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN HOUSE INC$108,911
SUNCOAST MANOR RETIREMENT COMMUNITY$93,859
WESTMINSTER PINES INC$77,346
RIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN APARTMENTS$73,234
GEORGIA BELLE APARTMENTS INC$26,476
PALM SHORES RETIREMENT COMMUNITY$12,652
LOUTTIT MANOR INC$9,219
MAGNOLIA TOWERS INC$6,403
SUNCOAST MANOR FOUNDATION INC$6,278
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $43.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WESLEY MANOR INC: $608k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $286k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $10.3M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $428k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $256k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $9.8M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $360k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $205k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $4.8M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $276k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $200k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $4.2M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $243k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $160k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $3.5M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $225k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $158k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $2.4M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $205k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $147k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $1.6M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $191k → 6%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $1.4M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $172k → 6%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $1.1M → 13%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $124k → 12%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $100k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53M · 12 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +50% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$53M
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+50%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39M · revenue +50%
  • WS
    WESTMINSTER SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +92%
  • JC
    JEFFERSON CENTER INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $3.0M · revenue +56% · 34% of their budget

Funded once

  • WS
    WESTMINSTER SENIOR SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Presbyterian Homes Inc

Florida presbyterian homes, inc. is a church related, non-profit community service organization dedicated and committed to providing services for older adults and persons with special needs by creating and preserving an excellent…

Human Services
2
Gateway Terrace Inc

We are a church related, non-profit organization dedicated and committed to providing services for older adults by creating and preserving excellent residential facilities. we believe in and are committed to honoring each person's dignity,…

Human Services
3
Westminster Place

Westminster place, a faith based not for profit, creates vibrant communities for older adults that inspire wellness, independence, joy and security - enriching the lives of residents and their families.

Human Services
4
Westminster Foundation Iii Inc

Westminster foundation iii, inc is a non-profit organization separate from westminster retirement communities, inc. and its affiliates, established to provide charitable funds for the support of needy persons, projects and programs at…

Housing & Shelter
5
Presbyterian Retirement Village of Rapid City

The sole program service of this organization is to maintain and operate a campus and retirement community to provide care to the elderly, including housing, nursing, cultural, and recreational services.

—
6
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
7
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
8
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
9
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
10
Portage Trail Care Center Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

Health
11
Westminster Retirement Communities Foundation Inc

Westminster retirement communities foundation, inc. is a non-profit organization separate from westminster retirement communities, inc. and its affiliates, established to provide charitable funds for the support of needy persons, projects,…

Housing & Shelter
12
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westminster Shores Inc; the most unlike its peers is Westminster Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC: $39,083,331 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INCWESLEY MANOR INC: $2,708,651 · Human ServicesWESLEY MANOR INCWESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $1,637,190 · Human ServicesWESTMINSTER SERVICES INC: $3,652,068 · Housing & ShelterWESTMINSTER SERVICE…JEFFERSON CENTER INC: $2,963,248 · Housing & ShelterJEFFERSON CENTER IN…COLLEGE ARMS TOWERS INC: $826,659 · Housing & ShelterCOLLEGE ARMS TOWERS…WESTMINSTER PINES INC: $591,815 · Housing & ShelterWESTMINSTER PINES I…PALM SHORES RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $527,706 · Housing & ShelterPALM SHORES RETIREM…+7 more: $384,050 · Housing & ShelterSUNCOAST MANOR RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $905,675 · Other
Human Services$43,429,172Housing & Shelter$8,945,546Other$905,675

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC: $39,083,331 over 9y, 8.1% of budgetWESTMINSTER SERVICES INC: $3,652,068 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetJEFFERSON CENTER INC: $2,963,248 over 3y, 34% of budgetWESLEY MANOR INC: $2,708,651 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $1,637,190 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetSUNCOAST MANOR RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $905,675 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCOLLEGE ARMS TOWERS INC: $826,659 over 5y, 45% of budgetWESTMINSTER PINES INC: $591,815 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPALM SHORES RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC: $527,706 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN HOUSE INC: $232,177 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetRIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN APARTMENTS INC: $73,234 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGEORGIA BELLE APARTMENTS INC: $26,476 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLOUTTIT MANOR INC: $22,458 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSUNCOAST MANOR FOUNDATION INC: $14,732 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWESTMINSTER SENIOR SERVICES INC: $8,570 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAGNOLIA TOWERS INC: $6,403 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY MANOR INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER SHORES INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNCOAST MANOR RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE ARMS TOWERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER PINES INC ↗
  • Who funds PALM SHORES RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN APARTMENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA BELLE APARTMENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUTTIT MANOR INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNCOAST MANOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGNOLIA TOWERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Westminster Foundation III IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Westminster Foundation III Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Westminster Retirement Communities Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Westminster Retirement Communities Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • College Arms Towers Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Georgia Belle Apartments Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Riverside Presbyterian Apartments Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Riverside Presbyterian House Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Westminster Retirement Communities Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Westminster Retirement Communities Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Westminster Retirement Communities’ filings →

More from the funding graph