Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Westminster Retirement Communities Foundation Inc

Westminster retirement communities foundation, inc.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9.8M
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$43MHousing & Shelter$8.9MOther$906k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $554k
  • $250k+2 grants · $10M
$77,346
Median grant
1
States reached
$115M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES$9,787,623
WESLEY MANOR INC$427,890
WESTMINSTER SHORES INC$200,189
RIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN HOUSE INC$108,911
SUNCOAST MANOR RETIREMENT COMMUNITY$93,859
WESTMINSTER PINES INC$77,346
RIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN APARTMENTS$73,234
GEORGIA BELLE APARTMENTS INC$26,476
PALM SHORES RETIREMENT COMMUNITY$12,652
LOUTTIT MANOR INC$9,219
MAGNOLIA TOWERS INC$6,403
SUNCOAST MANOR FOUNDATION INC$6,278
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $43.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WESLEY MANOR INC: $608k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $286k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $10.3M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $428k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $256k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $9.8M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $360k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $205k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $4.8M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $276k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $200k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $4.2M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $243k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $160k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $3.5M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $225k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $158k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $2.4M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $205k → 6%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $147k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $1.6M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $191k → 6%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $1.4M → 13%WESLEY MANOR INC: $172k → 6%PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $1.1M → 13%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $124k → 12%WESTMINSTER SHORES INC: $100k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$53M · 12 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +50% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$53M
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+50%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39M · revenue +50%
  • WS
    WESTMINSTER SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +92%
  • JC
    JEFFERSON CENTER INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $3.0M · revenue +56% · 34% of their budget

Funded once

  • WS
    WESTMINSTER SENIOR SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Presbyterian Homes Inc

Florida presbyterian homes, inc. is a church related, non-profit community service organization dedicated and committed to providing services for older adults and persons with special needs by creating and preserving an excellent…

Human Services
2
Gateway Terrace Inc

We are a church related, non-profit organization dedicated and committed to providing services for older adults by creating and preserving excellent residential facilities. we believe in and are committed to honoring each person's dignity,…

Human Services
3
Westminster Place

Westminster place, a faith based not for profit, creates vibrant communities for older adults that inspire wellness, independence, joy and security - enriching the lives of residents and their families.

Human Services
4
Westminster Foundation Iii Inc

Westminster foundation iii, inc is a non-profit organization separate from westminster retirement communities, inc. and its affiliates, established to provide charitable funds for the support of needy persons, projects and programs at…

Housing & Shelter
5
Presbyterian Retirement Village of Rapid City

The sole program service of this organization is to maintain and operate a campus and retirement community to provide care to the elderly, including housing, nursing, cultural, and recreational services.

6
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

7
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

8
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

9
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

10
Westminster Retirement Communities Foundation Inc

Westminster retirement communities foundation, inc. is a non-profit organization separate from westminster retirement communities, inc. and its affiliates, established to provide charitable funds for the support of needy persons, projects,…

Housing & Shelter
11
St Mark Manor Inc

None

12
Portage Trail Care Center Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westminster Shores Inc and the most unlike its peers is Westminster Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC — $39,083,331 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INCWESLEY MANOR INC — $2,708,651 · Human ServicesWESLEY MANOR INCWESTMINSTER SHORES INC — $1,637,190 · Human ServicesWESTMINSTER SERVICES INC — $3,652,068 · Housing & ShelterWESTMINSTER SERVICE…JEFFERSON CENTER INC — $2,963,248 · Housing & ShelterJEFFERSON CENTER IN…COLLEGE ARMS TOWERS INC — $826,659 · Housing & ShelterCOLLEGE ARMS TOWERS…WESTMINSTER PINES INC — $591,815 · Housing & ShelterWESTMINSTER PINES I…PALM SHORES RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC — $527,706 · Housing & ShelterPALM SHORES RETIREM…+7 more — $384,050 · Housing & ShelterSUNCOAST MANOR RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC — $905,675 · Other
Human Services$43,429,172Housing & Shelter$8,945,546Other$905,675

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC — $39,083,331 over 9y, 8.1% of budgetWESTMINSTER SERVICES INC — $3,652,068 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetJEFFERSON CENTER INC — $2,963,248 over 3y, 34% of budgetWESLEY MANOR INC — $2,708,651 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER SHORES INC — $1,637,190 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetSUNCOAST MANOR RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC — $905,675 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCOLLEGE ARMS TOWERS INC — $826,659 over 5y, 45% of budgetWESTMINSTER PINES INC — $591,815 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPALM SHORES RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC — $527,706 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN HOUSE INC — $232,177 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetRIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN APARTMENTS INC — $73,234 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGEORGIA BELLE APARTMENTS INC — $26,476 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLOUTTIT MANOR INC — $22,458 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSUNCOAST MANOR FOUNDATION INC — $14,732 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWESTMINSTER SENIOR SERVICES INC — $8,570 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAGNOLIA TOWERS INC — $6,403 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER SERVICES INC
  • Who funds JEFFERSON CENTER INC
  • Who funds WESLEY MANOR INC
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER SHORES INC
  • Who funds SUNCOAST MANOR RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC
  • Who funds COLLEGE ARMS TOWERS INC
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER PINES INC
  • Who funds PALM SHORES RETIREMENT COMMUNITY INC
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN HOUSE INC
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE PRESBYTERIAN APARTMENTS INC
  • Who funds GEORGIA BELLE APARTMENTS INC
  • Who funds LOUTTIT MANOR INC
  • Who funds SUNCOAST MANOR FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER SENIOR SERVICES INC
  • Who funds MAGNOLIA TOWERS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Westminster Foundation III IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Westminster Foundation III Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Westminster Retirement Communities Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 120%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • College Arms Towers Inc4% of income from government
  • Georgia Belle Apartments Inc3% of income from government
  • Riverside Presbyterian Apartments Inc2% of income from government
  • Riverside Presbyterian House Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Westminster Retirement Communities Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Westminster Retirement Communities Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph