Skip to content

Colorado · Public charity

Western Resource Advocates

Western Resource Advocates (WRA) is a regional nonprofit advocacy organization fighting climate change and its impacts to sustain the environment, economy, and people of the West. As the region's go-to experts for more than three decades, WRA's on-the-ground work advances clean energy, protects air, land, water, and wildlife. WRA…

$154k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
50%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$150k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$150,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$150,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 12
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$16M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 50% of the organizations Western Resource Advocates funded were first-time grantees, receiving 15% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentCivil RightsMembership BenefitEducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$150k0%
FY20242$295k50%
FY20235$378k80%
FY20222$50k0%
FY20214$120k100%
FY202011$431k45%
FY201912$680k75%
FY20184$135k50%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$2.0MMembership Benefit$70kCivil Rights$50kCommunity Improvement$40k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
NV
WY
CA
UT
CO
AZ
NM
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
WRA Action Fund$700,000486%
Colorado State University$227,7052n/a
Conservation Colorado$200,00018%
Powder River Basin Resource Council$140,00037%
Interwest Energy Alliance$125,000213%
Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest$100,00043%
Signal Tech Coalition$100,0001n/a
Prosperity Works$95,00035%
Utah Clean Energy Alliance Inc$75,00033%
The Partnership Project Inc$59,50010%
Show all 28 grantees
All grantees of Western Resource Advocates by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
WRA Action Fund$700,000486%
Colorado State University$227,7052n/a
Conservation Colorado$200,00018%
Powder River Basin Resource Council$140,00037%
Interwest Energy Alliance$125,000213%
Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest$100,00043%
Signal Tech Coalition$100,0001n/a
Prosperity Works$95,00035%
Utah Clean Energy Alliance Inc$75,00033%
The Partnership Project Inc$59,50010%
University of Utah$50,0002n/a
Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated$50,00010%
American Rivers Inc$45,80010%
To Nizhoni Ani$45,00015%
Black Mesa Trust inc$40,000120%
Southwest Research & Information Center$35,0002n/a
River Network$32,00011%
Utah Foundation$25,00014%
University of Wyoming$25,0001n/a
Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies$25,00012%
Renewable Northwest Project Dba Renewable Northwest$25,00011%
Conservation Voters New Mexico Education Fund$25,00014%
City of Aspen$15,0001n/a
Acting in Community Together in Organizing Northern Nevada$15,00012%
One Apia Nevada$15,00013%
FRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake$10,00015%
Bonneville Environmental Foundation$8,00010%
Conversation Ink$5,2001n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Western Resource Advocates supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 21 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWRA Action Fund: $700,000 over 4y, 86% of budgetConservation Colorado: $200,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetPowder River Basin Resource Council: $140,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetInterwest Energy Alliance: $125,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetArizona Center for Law in the Public Interest: $100,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetProsperity Works: $95,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetUtah Clean Energy Alliance Inc: $75,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetThe Partnership Project Inc: $59,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEnvironmental Defense Fund Incorporated: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Rivers Inc: $45,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTo Nizhoni Ani: $45,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBlack Mesa Trust inc: $40,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetRiver Network: $32,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUtah Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCenter for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRenewable Northwest Project Dba Renewable Northwest: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetConservation Voters New Mexico Education Fund: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetActing in Community Together in Organizing Northern Nevada: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOne Apia Nevada: $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBonneville Environmental Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 21.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United States Energy FoundationCA23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United States Energy Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Tides Foundation · Western Conservation Foundation · The Energy Foundation · New Venture Fund · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated · The Nature Conservancy · Energy Action Fund · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · The Pew Charitable Trusts

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Western Resource Advocates with peer funders

About Western Resource Advocates

How much does Western Resource Advocates give?
Western Resource Advocates reported 1 itemized grants totaling $150,000, out of $154,284 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 12 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Western Resource Advocates fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (93%), Membership Benefit (3%), Civil Rights (2%).
Who are Western Resource Advocates's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: WRA Action Fund ($700k), Colorado State University ($228k), Conservation Colorado ($200k).
Does Western Resource Advocates fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Western Resource Advocates?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include United States Energy Foundation, Patagoniaorg, Tides Foundation.
Where is Western Resource Advocates based?
Western Resource Advocates is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Western Resource Advocates’ filings →

More from the funding graph