Skip to content

· Public charity

Western Fire Chiefs Association Inc

To pursue the protection of life and property by leadership, education and support for its members and affiliate organizations.

$171k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$819kEducation$107kCommunity Improvement$52kFood & Nutrition$13k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $131,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $171,375 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $40,375 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $102k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$51,500
CAL POLY CORPORATION$50,000
SOUTHEASTERN ASSC-FIRE CHIEFS$15,000
CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC$8,000
GREAT LAKES DIVISION$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAL POLY CORPORATION: $57k → 12%CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC: $8k → 12%CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $108k → 18%SOUTHWESTERN FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $6k → 13%SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $22k → 13%GREAT LAKES DIVISION: $7k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN ASSC-FIRE CHIEFS: $15k → 17%OREGON FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $53k → 8%GREAT LAKES DIVISION: $12k → 12%WASHINGTON FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC: $7k → 9%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $52k → 6%CAL POLY CORPORATION: $50k → 12%CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC: $8k → 12%CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $58k → 18%SOUTHWESTERN FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 13%SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $19k → 13%GREAT LAKES DIVISION: $7k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN ASSC-FIRE CHIEFS: $15k → 17%OREGON FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC: $6k → 8%GREAT LAKES DIVISION: $11k → 12%INTERNATIONAL AFC: $52k → 6%CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $8k → 18%SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $17k → 13%SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $15k → 17%OREGON FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION: $5k → 8%GREAT LAKES DIVISION: $11k → 12%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $50k → 6%CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $8k → 18%SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $15k → 13%GREAT LAKES DIVISION: $7k → 12%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $50k → 6%CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $8k → 18%SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $15k → 13%GREAT LAKES DIVISION: $7k → 12%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $45k → 6%CALIFORNIA FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION: $6k → 18%GREAT LAKES DIVISION: $7k → 12%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $42k → 6%INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $25k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
OR
OH
CA
NE
VA
SC
OK
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$879k · 10 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$879k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+114%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    California Fire Chiefs Association
    8× · 2017–2024 · $212k · revenue +171%
  • CP
    CAL POLY CORPORATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $107k · revenue +18%
  • SA
    SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $103k · revenue +200%

Funded once

  • WS
    WA State Association of Fire Chiefsgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $54k · revenue +114%
  • WF
    WASHINGTON FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Diego Co Fire Chiefs Association San Diego Fire Chiefs Training Officers

Enhance capabilities of Fire Training Officers in San Diego County.

Education
2
Int'l Association of Firefighters Local 1186

To represent firefighters in contract negotiations.

—
3
Racine Firefighters Association

The Racine Firefighters Association is a part of the Racine Volunteer Fire Department.

Public Benefit
4
California State Firefighters Association

We are dedicated to ensuring our members a strong and united voice in the evolution of the Fire Service through unity in leadership political action education and quality member services.

Community Improvement
5
International Association of Fire Fighters

The objectives are to secure adequate remuneration, for the betterment of conditions,for a higher degree of efficiency, to improve the standards for moral, social and economic standards, the cultivation of good fellowship among its members.

—
6
The State Firemens and Fire Marshals Association of Texas

The Association serves the fire and emergency responders of Texas and beyond, exists to improve the Texas fire service, and is committed to the betterment of Texas emergency services.

—
7
Fire Chiefs Association of Santa Barbara County

To provide a mutual association of chief officers of the fire departments within Santa Barbara County, to promote the efficient operation and well being of member fire departments, to coordinate all operations deemed necessary in times of…

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Intl Assoc of Firefighters A3

To provide assistance to member locals in local union efforts and legislative efforts at the state level.

—
9
International Association of Fire Fighters

Provide insurance for members. Provide group purchasing for members for recreational supplies. Organize and fund retirement promotions and other parties and social events. Provide legal counsel for negotiations with city in regards to…

—
10
Virginia Fire Chiefs Association Inc Co James H Johnson

Virginia fire chief's association is the advocate for leadership of emergency response organizations, providing comprehensive and integrated statewide public safty efforts, enhancing the quality of life for citizens of virginia by reducing…

—
11
California Fire Chiefs Ems Fire and Education Foundation

Education of Emergency First Responders.

Education
12
Alaska Professional Firefighters Association

Bringing firefighters together with one voice to promote the training, working conditions, rights, and safety of the occupation.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Association of Fire Chiefs Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cal Poly Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

California Fire Chiefs Association: $212,469 · OtherCalifornia Fire Chiefs AssociationOREGON FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION INC: $63,786 · OtherOREGON FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION INCWA State Association of Fire Chiefs: $54,000 · OtherWA State Association of Fire ChiefsGREAT LAKES DIVISION IAFC: $53,461 · OtherGREAT LAKES DIVISION IAFCIndividual grant recipient: $51,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTHEASTERN ASSC-FIRE CHIEFS: $30,000 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN ASSC-FIRE CHIEFSMISSOURI VALLEY ASSOC OF FIRE CHIEFS: $19,130 · Other+2 more: $19,500 · OtherINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS INC: $264,465 · Public Safety & DisasterINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF F…CAL POLY CORPORATION: $107,400 · EducationCAL POLY CORP…SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $11,369 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN …SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $103,477 · Community ImprovementSOUTHEASTER…
Other$503,846Public Safety & Disaster$264,465Education$118,769Community Improvement$103,477

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS INC: $264,465 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCalifornia Fire Chiefs Association: $212,469 over 8y, 14% of budgetCAL POLY CORPORATION: $107,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $103,477 over 6y, 19% of budgetOREGON FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION INC: $63,786 over 3y, 13% of budgetWA State Association of Fire Chiefs: $54,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetGREAT LAKES DIVISION IAFC: $53,461 over 6y, 20% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS: $11,369 over 2y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS INC ↗
  • Who funds California Fire Chiefs Association ↗
  • Who funds CAL POLY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WA State Association of Fire Chiefs ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES DIVISION IAFC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CHIEFS ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Western Fire Chiefs Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Western Fire Chiefs Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Oregon Fire Chiefs Association Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Western Fire Chiefs Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph