Skip to content

· Public charity

Western Citizens Protecting Our Constitution

Wcpoc shall engage in social welfare activities by educating the general public on threats to state and federal constitutions.

$1.4M
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$898k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Public Benefit$1.6MEmployment$967kEducation$358kPublic Safety & Disaster$249kCivil Rights$100kCommunity Improvement$8k
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $479k
  • $250k+1 grant · $898k
$180,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$37k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREEDOM'S FUTURE FUND$897,500
DEFEND COLORADO IEC$248,500
BETTER JOBS COALITION$180,000
CONSERVATIVE VALUES PAC$50,000
ADVANCE COLORADO$40,000
BUSINESS AND LABOR TOGETHER$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FREEDOM'S FUTURE FUND: $898k → 10%MOTHERS FOR MODERATION: $200k → 14%RESPONSIBLE DOUGLAS COUNTY: $13k → 3%BETTER JOBS COALITION: $429k → 7%ADVANCE COLORADO: $40k → 8%AMERICAN LIBERTY NETWORK: $50k → 11%CLEAR INFORMATION COLORADO: $100k → 12%CONSERVATIVE VALUES PAC: $50k → 10%REPUBLICAN ATTORNEY GENERAL ASSOCIATION: $170k → 14%VOTER APPROVAL OF FEES: $100k → 3%BETTER JOBS COALITION: $180k → 7%DEFEND COLORADO IEC: $249k → 8%COLO REPUBLICAN IEC: $25k → 12%BETTER JOBS COALITION IEC: $50k → 7%PROTECTING OUR CONSTITUTION: $65k → 8%COMPASS COLORADO: $30k → 12%BETTER JOBS COALITION EIC: $38k → 7%PROTECTING OUR CONSTITUTION: $55k → 8%RMDC5 LM COOP FUND: $70k → 12%BETTER JOBS COALITION: $10k → 7%WCPOC IEC: $20k → 8%BUSINESS AND LABOR TOGETHER: $8k → 12%COLORADO STRONG IEC: $50k → 7%CITIZENS FOR A SOUND GOVERNMENT: $35k → 7%DON'T TURN COLORADO INTO CALIFORNIA: $130k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$827k · 3 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -22% since the first grant, against -31% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
14

Total granted

$827k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-22%
-31%

Still filing today

33%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
Civil RightsPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BJ
    BETTER JOBS COALITION
    3× · 2018–2022 · $619k · revenue -22% · 54% of their budget
  • PO
    PROTECTING OUR CONSTITUTION
    2× · 2018–2020 · $120k
  • BJ
    BETTER JOBS COALITION IEC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $88k

Funded once

  • WF
    Workforce Fairness Institute Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $260k · revenue -31% · 25% of their budget
  • MF
    MOTHERS FOR MODERATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $200k
  • RA
    Republican Attorneys General Assoc
    one grant, 2018 · $170k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Rising State Action

The organization is focused on holding special interest networks accountable and advancing conservative principles. We're fighting for limited government, lowering taxes, fighting government over-regulation that stifles freedom, free…

—
2
Building a Better Colorado

To conduct research, promote community engagement, and provide an amalgamation of information to the citizens of colorado.

Community Improvement
3
Rocky Mountain Policy Group

Promoting a strong state economy with limited government taxes and regulation.

—
4
Protect Colorados Vote

To oppose a colorado statewide ballot initiative to join the national popular vote compact

—
5
Defend Colorado

The mission of the organization is to conduct research and analysis of conditions affecting the Colorado state economy and promote policies that strengthen the state economy.

—
6
Colorado Taxpayers' Advocate Fund Inc

To educate citizens and colorado public officials on issues of public policy.

Public Benefit
7
Coloradans for Progress

To research and distribute information to citizens concerning the general affordability of life, of the economy, and of the environment and advocating for workers and a strong jobs market in colorado.

—
8
Defend Democracy Now

Conduct research and expose abuse of authority and power by government authorities and the deleterious effect such actions have on american democracy.

—
9
Unite for Colorado

To promote the common good and general welfare of americans by promoting public policy that strengthens the economy, promotes job growth, and supports fair and reasonable business regulations.

—
10
Press Watch

To educate journalists and the public, and foster public debate, about improving political journalism to reflect public needs and hold the powerful accountable.

—
11
Public Trust Institute

The corporation is organized to uphold colorado's constitution and defend the principles of individual freedom and personal responsibility on which colorado was founded.

Crime & Legal
12
Colorado Works

To research and distribute information to citizens advocating for workers and a strong jobs market in colorado

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advance Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Rocky Mountain Pipe Trades District Council No 5. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FREEDOM'S FUTURE FUND INC: $897,500 · OtherFREEDOM'S FUTURE FUND INCBETTER JOBS COALITION: $619,000 · OtherBETTER JOBS COALITIONDEFEND IEC: $248,500 · OtherDEFEND IECMOTHERS FOR MODERATION INC: $200,000 · OtherMOTHERS FOR MODERATION INCRepublican Attorneys General Assoc: $170,000 · OtherRepublican Attorneys General AssocDON'T TURN COLORADO INTO CALIFORNIA: $130,000 · OtherPROTECTING OUR CONSTITUTION: $120,000 · OtherVOTER APPROVAL OF FEES: $100,000 · Other+9 more: $333,239 · Other+9 moreWorkforce Fairness Institute Inc: $260,000 · Community ImprovementCLEAR INFORMATION COLORADO: $100,000 · Civil RightsCITIZENS FOR A SOUND GOVERNMENT: $35,000 · Civil RightsRocky Mountain Pipe Trades District Council No 5: $70,000 · EmploymentADVANCE COLORADO: $40,000 · Public Benefit
Other$2,818,239Community Improvement$260,000Civil Rights$135,000Employment$70,000Public Benefit$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFREEDOM'S FUTURE FUND INC: $897,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetBETTER JOBS COALITION: $619,000 over 3y, 54% of budgetWorkforce Fairness Institute Inc: $260,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetCLEAR INFORMATION COLORADO: $100,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetRocky Mountain Pipe Trades District Council No 5: $70,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetADVANCE COLORADO: $40,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCITIZENS FOR A SOUND GOVERNMENT: $35,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetCOMPASS COLORADO: $30,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FREEDOM'S FUTURE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BETTER JOBS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Workforce Fairness Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS FOR MODERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEAR INFORMATION COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Pipe Trades District Council No 5 ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCE COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR A SOUND GOVERNMENT ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS COLORADO ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Western Citizens Protecting Our Constitution funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Western Citizens Protecting Our Constitution. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Western Citizens Protecting Our Constitution’s filings →

    More from the funding graph