· Public charity
West Virginians for Affordable Health Care
To support systemic health care reform measures to ensure that everyone in west virginia has access to quality, affordable health care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WV CITIZENS ACTION EDUCATION FUND | $72,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +384% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WVWEST VIRGINIA CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND7× · 2017–2023 · $327k · revenue +384%
- WVWEST VIRGINIA CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY INC6× · 2017–2022 · $134k · revenue +104%
- WVWEST VIRGINIA CHAPTER OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS INC4× · 2017–2021 · $38k · revenue +330%
Funded once
- WVWEST VIRGINIA HEALTHY KIDS AND FAMILIES COALITIONone grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -99%
- TLTHE LEARNING TREE HOUSEone grant, 2020 · $10k
- WPWV PARTNERSHIP FOR ELDER LIVING INCone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To end personal and institutional violence in the lives of women, children and men.
The wvhii is a statewide collaboration among multiple stakeholders focusing on improving the health and health care of the citizens of west virginia.
To improve the health and health care quality for the residents of west virginia.
Supervision of child care providers
Provide childd care services and preschool for children birth to age 12
The organization provides training and technical assistance to water and wastewater utility providers throughout the State of West Virginia through a variety of programs.
The west virginia association for young children is dedicated to supporting high quality early childhood programs, expanding opportunities for early childhood professionals, and advocating for west virginia' young children. west virginia…
Strengthening public health agencies and the broader public health and health care systems in west virginia.
To improve the health and well-being of all west virginians by reducing the impact of adverse childhoold experiences and preventing their occurrence.
Contracts with child care resource agencies to provide assistance to working parents in locating and identifying child care programs and to collect, maintain, and disseminate
Nurturing the mental health and psychological well being of children, adults and families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia Citizen Action Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Fair Shake Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA CHAPTER OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS INC ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTHY KIDS AND FAMILIES COALITION ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP OF AFRICAN AMERICAN CHURCHES ↗
- Who funds Zion Child Development Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FAIR SHAKE NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds PLAYMATES PRE-SCHOOL AND CHILD-CARE CENTERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: River Valley Child Development Services Services Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · New Venture Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization West Virginians for Affordable Health Care funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.