Skip to content
West Virginia Foundation for Rape at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

West Virginia Foundation for Rape

The organization provides a comprhensive coordination of statewide rape information services, through education and training on the issues surrounding sexual violence and promoting and implementing sexual violence prevention and intervention activities.

$3.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$431k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$12MHuman Services$1.3MHealth$231kCivil Rights$85k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $943k
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.1M
$271,382
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPPER OHIO VALLEY SEXUAL$431,398
CONTACT HUNTINGTON INC$422,006
EASTERN PANHANDLE EMPOWERMENT$380,346
HOPE INC$328,887
FAMILY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER$292,257
FAMILY COUNSELING CONNECTION$271,382
FAMILY REFUGE CENTER$214,442
RAPE & DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$177,113
COMPREHENSIVE WOMEN'S SERVICE$162,947
WOMENS AID IN CRISIS$160,587
FAMILY CRISIS CENTER$121,128
SAFE INC$106,640
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%WOMENS AID IN CRISIS: $161k → 17%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $214k → 18%SAFE INC: $123k → 25%WOMENS AID IN CRISIS: $129k → 17%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $199k → 18%SAFE INC: $107k → 25%WOMENS AID IN CRISIS: $113k → 17%FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $186k → 18%SAFE INC: $86k → 25%WOMENS AID IN CRISIS: $105k → 17%SAFE INC: $37k → 25%WOMEN'S AID IN CRISIS: $102k → 17%SAFE INC: $13k → 25%WOMENS AID IN CRISIS: $97k → 17%SAFE INC: $3k → 25%WOMENS AID IN CRISIS: $85k → 17%WOMENS AID IN CRISIS: $83k → 17%WOMEN'S AID IN CRISIS: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 15 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
0

Total granted

$14M
$0

Still filing today

87%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CONTACT - HUNTINGTON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +120% · 38% of their budget
  • SW
    SHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +122%
  • TU
    THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY SEXUAL ASSAULT HEL P CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +208% · 47% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Ywca of Central Virginia

    The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

    Human Services
    2
    Family Crisis Shelter Inc

    To provide safe shelter, advocacy, counseling, referrals and support to all victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

    Civil Rights
    3
    Family Crisis Center Inc

    The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

    Human Services
    4
    Crisis Control Center

    Provide on-going support services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. support includes a safe house & 24 hour phone line.

    Human Services
    5
    Domestic Abuse Council of Volusia County Inc

    Assist victims of domestic violence

    Human Services
    6
    Fannin County Family Crisis Center

    To aid victims of domestic violence

    Human Services
    7
    Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

    Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

    —
    8
    Women's Alliance Inc

    Provide servies to victims of domestic violence, sexual assualt and homeless families.

    Human Services
    9
    Family Crisis Center

    Promote safety, self-sufficiency, hope and healing to those effected by abuse.

    Health
    10
    Crisis Care Line

    Domestic violence victim services

    —
    11
    Domestic Violence and Abuse Center

    Provide services to victims of domestic violence and abuse

    Human Services
    12
    Assault Care Center Extending Shelter an

    Assist rape and domestic violence victims.

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Family Crisis Intervention Center of Region V Inc; the most unlike its peers is Contact - Huntington Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    3
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    7
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/13
    Grantees still filing
    12/13
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    SHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $1,562,193 · OtherSHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER INCFAMILY COUNSELING CONNECTION INC: $1,493,390 · OtherFAMILY COUNSELING CONNECTION INCTHE FAMILY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER OF REGION V INC: $717,680 · OtherTHE FAMILY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER OF …FAMILY REFUGE CENTER: $601,957 · OtherFAMILY REFUGE CENTERHOPE INC: $418,113 · OtherHOPE INCFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $283,203 · OtherFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INCCONTACT - HUNTINGTON INC: $2,032,377 · HealthCONTACT - HUNTINGTON INCTHE UPPER OHIO VALLEY SEXUAL ASSAULT HEL P CENTER INC: $1,505,946 · HealthTHE UPPER OHIO VALLEY SEXUAL ASSAULT …RAPE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INFORMATION C: $1,028,440 · HealthRAPE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INFORMATIO…TASK FORCE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOPE INC: $1,386,552 · Human ServicesTASK FORCE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE H…WOMENS AID IN CRISIS INC: $950,489 · Human ServicesWOMENS AID IN CRISIS INCCOMPREHENSIVE WOMENS SERVICE COUNCI: $780,865 · Human ServicesCOMPREHENSIVE WOMENS SERVICE COUN…FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC: $599,352 · Human ServicesFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INCS A F E INC: $368,189 · Human ServicesS A F E INCFAIRNESS WV INSTITUTE INC: $85,028 · Civil Rights
    Other$5,076,536Health$4,566,763Human Services$4,085,447Civil Rights$85,028

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONTACT - HUNTINGTON INC: $2,032,377 over 9y, 38% of budgetSHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $1,562,193 over 9y, 20% of budgetTHE UPPER OHIO VALLEY SEXUAL ASSAULT HEL P CENTER INC: $1,505,946 over 9y, 47% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING CONNECTION INC: $1,493,390 over 9y, 14% of budgetTASK FORCE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOPE INC: $1,386,552 over 6y, 27% of budgetRAPE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INFORMATION C: $1,028,440 over 9y, 18% of budgetWOMENS AID IN CRISIS INC: $950,489 over 9y, 15% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE WOMENS SERVICE COUNCI: $780,865 over 9y, 12% of budgetTHE FAMILY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER OF REGION V INC: $717,680 over 9y, 24% of budgetFAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC: $599,352 over 3y, 17% of budgetS A F E INC: $368,189 over 6y, 12% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $283,203 over 5y, 14% of budgetFAIRNESS WV INSTITUTE INC: $85,028 over 5y, 5.4% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CONTACT - HUNTINGTON INC ↗
    • Who funds SHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY SEXUAL ASSAULT HEL P CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING CONNECTION INC ↗
    • Who funds TASK FORCE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOPE INC ↗
    • Who funds RAPE AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INFORMATION C ↗
    • Who funds WOMENS AID IN CRISIS INC ↗
    • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE WOMENS SERVICE COUNCI ↗
    • Who funds THE FAMILY CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER OF REGION V INC ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY REFUGE CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds S A F E INC ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds FAIRNESS WV INSTITUTE INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Amazonsmile Foundation
    Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization West Virginia Foundation for Rape funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from West Virginia Foundation for Rape. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on West Virginia Foundation for Rape’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home