Skip to content
West Virginia Coalition to End Homelessness Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

West Virginia Coalition to End Homelessness Inc

The mission of the wvceh is to create partnerships and collaborations at the local, state, and national levels to develop and implement long-term solutions to homelessness and poverty.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$263k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $989k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.0M
$144,606
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$262,737
PROJECT RAINBOW INC$260,060
KANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE$254,998
YWCA OF CHARLESTON$251,204
NCWV COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOC INC$245,002
GREATER WHEELING COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$180,627
RALEIGH COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION$144,606
NFS MINISTRIES$125,754
HUNTINGTON CITY MISSION$125,000
LIFE HUB INC$110,000
CLARKSBURG HARRISON REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY$57,525
Individual grant recipient$44,628
RANDOLPH COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY$44,561
Individual grant recipient$30,200
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $506k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%KANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE: $255k → 18%YWCA OF CHARLESTON: $251k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
0/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $262,737 · OtherJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INCNCWV COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOC INC: $245,002 · OtherNCWV COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOC INCTHE GREATER WHEELING COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $180,627 · OtherTHE GREATER WHEELING COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCRALEIGH COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION: $144,606 · OtherRALEIGH COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTIONHUNTINGTON CITY MISSION: $125,000 · OtherHUNTINGTON CITY MISSIONLIFE HUB INC: $110,000 · OtherLIFE HUB INCCLARKSBURG HARRISON REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY: $57,525 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $44,628 · OtherRANDOLPH COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY: $44,561 · Other+1 more: $30,200 · OtherKANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE INC: $254,998 · Human ServicesKANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE …YWCA OF CHARLESTON WEST VIRGINIA INC: $251,204 · Human ServicesYWCA OF CHARLESTON WEST VI…Project Rainbow: $260,060 · Housing & ShelterProject RainbowNFS MINISTRIES: $125,754 · Housing & ShelterNFS MINISTRIES
Other$1,244,886Human Services$506,202Housing & Shelter$385,814

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $262,737 over 1y, 19% of budgetProject Rainbow: $260,060 over 1y, 86% of budgetKANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE INC: $254,998 over 1y, 14% of budgetYWCA OF CHARLESTON WEST VIRGINIA INC: $251,204 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTHE GREATER WHEELING COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $180,627 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetNFS MINISTRIES: $125,754 over 1y, 25% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization West Virginia Coalition to End Homelessness Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from West Virginia Coalition to End Homelessness Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on West Virginia Coalition to End Homelessness’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home