Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

West Virginia Alliance of Recovery Residences Inc

Ensure and promote access to safe, high quality recovery housing for people with substance use disorders through certification, training, technical assitance, and advocacy.

$45k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,625
Median grant
1
States reached
$524k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPPORTUNITY HOUSE INC$5,625
MID-OHIO VALLEY FELLOWHSIP HOME$5,625
RECOVERY GROUP OF SOUTHERN WV$5,625
GOD'S WAY HOME$5,625
WEST VIRGINIA SOBER LIVING$5,625
RCCR SAMARITAN INN$5,625
YMCA WHEELING WIND PROGRAM$5,625
CLARKSBURG MISSION SOBER LIVING HOMES$5,625
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%YMCA WHEELING WIND PROGRAM: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR COMMUNITY RENEWAL INC — $5,625 · OtherRELIGIOUS COALITION FOR COMMUNITY RENEWAL INCMID-OHIO VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $5,625 · OtherMID-OHIO VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INCOPPORTUNITY HOUSE INC — $5,625 · OtherOPPORTUNITY HOUSE INCCLARKSBURG MISSION INC — $5,625 · OtherCLARKSBURG MISSION INCGods Way Home Inc — $5,625 · Housing & ShelterGods Way Home IncMORGANTOWN SOBER LIVING INC — $5,625 · Housing & ShelterMORGANTOWN SOBER LIVING INCRECOVERY GROUP OF SWV INC — $5,625 · HealthRECOVERY GROUP…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV — $5,625 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS C…
Other$22,500Housing & Shelter$11,250Health$5,625Human Services$5,625

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRECOVERY GROUP OF SWV INC — $5,625 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRELIGIOUS COALITION FOR COMMUNITY RENEWAL INC — $5,625 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMID-OHIO VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $5,625 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGods Way Home Inc — $5,625 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetMORGANTOWN SOBER LIVING INC — $5,625 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLARKSBURG MISSION INC — $5,625 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV — $5,625 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization West Virginia Alliance of Recovery Residences Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph