Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

West Shore Rotary Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$730
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$20kFood & Nutrition$7kRecreation & Sports$4kInternational$4kCommunity Improvement$2kArts & Culture$2kHealth$2kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
4
States reached
$119k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH CHALLENGE$730
FOP LODGE 25$500
MEALS ON WHEELS$500
Individual grant recipient$500
FAIRVIEW PARK HUNGER CENTER$250
NORTH OLMSTED HUNGER CENTER$250
WEST PARK HUNGER CENTER$250
ROTARY CLUB OF ASHEVILLE NC$200
FAIRVIEW PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CHURCH STREET MINISTRIES: $50 → 17%GIRLS WITH SOLE: $200 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$35k · 18 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
9

Total granted

$35k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+10%

Still filing today

22%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $5k

Funded once

  • BC
    BIKE CLEVELANDgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +41%
  • OO
    OMNI - ORPANS MEDICAL NETWORK INT'L
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • KS
    KENT STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwest Baptist University

Christ-centered, caring academic community preparing students to be servant leaders in a global society; a higher-education institution offering courses that lead to both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education
2
Hathaway Brown School

The school is dedicated to excellence in the education of girls. our true mission, as reflected in our motto "non scholae sed vitae discimus," is learning & preparation for life.

Education
3
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
4
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
5
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education
6
Alvernia University

Alvernia university is a catholic comprehensive university with a liberal arts foundation founded by the bernardine franciscan sisters in 1958. see continuation on schedule o.

7
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
8
Lynn University Inc

Founded in 1962 and located in boca raton, florida, lynn university is an independent, coeducational institution accredited by the southern association of colleges and schools commission on colleges (sacscoc). (continued in sch o)the…

Education
9
Barry University Inc

Barry university is a catholic institution of higher education founded by the adrian dominican sisters. with a liberal arts tradition, barry university is a scholarly community committed to the highest academic standards in undergraduate,…

Education
10
America Scores Cleveland

America scores cleveland inspires urban youth to lead healthy lives, be engaged students, and have the confidence and character to make a difference in the world.

11
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
12
Chatham University

Chatham university prepares women and men to be world ready: to build lives of purpose and value and fulfilling work. (see continuation on schedule o)in addition to appropriate professional skills and liberal arts learning, chatham…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Butler University and the most unlike its peers is Girls With Sole. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY — $4,500 · OtherCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI — $4,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $4,500 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITYROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $3,630 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALCITY OF FAIRVIEW PARK — $2,700 · OtherCITY OF FAIRVIEW PARKYOUTH CHALLENGE — $2,227 · OtherYOUTH CHALLENGEMEALS ON WHEELS — $1,750 · OtherNANZE — $1,700 · OtherOMNI - ORPANS MEDICAL NETWORK INT'L — $1,680 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,650 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6630 — $1,417 · Other+10 more — $6,450 · Other+10 moreButler University — $1,500 · EducationButler Univ…John Carroll University — $1,500 · EducationJohn Carrol…BAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $1,500 · EducationBAYLOR UNIV…BIKE CLEVELAND — $2,194 · Recreation & SportsGirls With Sole — $200 · Human ServicesSECOND MILE OUTREACH — $50 · Human Services
Other$38,204Education$4,500Recreation & Sports$2,194Human Services$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUTH CHALLENGE — $2,227 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIKE CLEVELAND — $2,194 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetButler University — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJohn Carroll University — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6630 — $1,417 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAIRVIEW PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $600 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCLEVELAND GUARDIANS CHARITIES INC — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND MILE OUTREACH — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTH CHALLENGE
  • Who funds BIKE CLEVELAND
  • Who funds Butler University
  • Who funds John Carroll University
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6630
  • Who funds FAIRVIEW PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CLEVELAND GUARDIANS CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds Girls With Sole
  • Who funds SECOND MILE OUTREACH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization West Shore Rotary Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph