Skip to content

· Public charity

West Alabama Regional Commission

The general purpose of the WEST ALABAMA REGIONAL COMMISSION is to plan for the unified and far-reaching development of the west alabama region, eliminate duplication of services by member governments, and promote economy and efficiency through coordination between member governments.

$487k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.9MCrime & Legal$477kHealth$275kPublic Benefit$103kScience & Tech$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $336k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$110,687
FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS$101,600
PICKENS CO FAMILY RESOURCE CTR$68,000
LEGAL SERVICES OF ALABAMA (LSA)$56,000
FAYETTE COUNTY COMMISSION$30,000
GREENE COUNTY COMMISSION$26,000
SARCOA$14,397
TOWN OF WOODSTOCK$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CITY OF GREENSBORO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CITY OF MOUNDVILLE$10,000
TOWN OF BOLIGEE$10,000
CITY OF BRENT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS: $171k → 17%FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS: $138k → 17%FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS: $110k → 17%FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS: $102k → 17%FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS: $102k → 17%FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS: $102k → 17%FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS: $102k → 17%FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS: $97k → 17%FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS: $97k → 17%CARING DAYS: $8k → 17%CARING DAYS: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 18 repeat orgs$236k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +139% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$4.1M
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+139%
+54%

Still filing today

11%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS OF TUSCALO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +22%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2021–2025 · $671k
  • PC
    PICKENS CO FAMILY RESOURCE CTR
    9× · 2017–2025 · $549k

Funded once

  • UC
    UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF HUNTSVILLE AND TENNESSEE VALLEYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $164k · revenue +54%
  • TO
    TOWN OF BOLIGEE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $670,639 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPICKENS CO FAMILY RESOURCE CTR: $548,739 · OtherPICKENS CO FAMILY RESOURCE CTRFAYETTE COUNTY COMMISSION: $464,005 · OtherFAYETTE COUNTY COMMISSIONBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $420,588 · OtherBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAGREENE COUNTY COMMISSION: $199,992 · OtherGREENE COUNTY COMMISSIONUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF HUNTSVILLE AND TENNESSEE VALLEY: $164,365 · Other+13 more: $735,455 · Other+13 moreFOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS OF TUSCALO: $1,018,949 · Human ServicesFOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS OF…+1 more: $16,246 · Human ServicesLEGAL SERVICES ALABAMA INC: $56,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,203,783Human Services$1,035,195Crime & Legal$56,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS OF TUSCALO: $1,018,949 over 9y, 16% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF HUNTSVILLE AND TENNESSEE VALLEY: $164,365 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES ALABAMA INC: $56,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCARING DAYS INC: $16,246 over 2y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOCUS ON SENIOR CITIZENS OF TUSCALO ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF HUNTSVILLE AND TENNESSEE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds CARING DAYS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tombigbee Resource Conservation and Development CouncilAL19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tombigbee Resource Conservation and Development Council · Alabama Power Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization West Alabama Regional Commission funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from West Alabama Regional Commission. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on West Alabama Regional Commission’s filings →

    More from the funding graph